vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. (FIGR) and GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD (GILT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($156.4M vs $152.7M, roughly 1.0× GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD). Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.3% vs 4.1%, a 53.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. is a financial technology company in Reno, Nevada, United States. Established in 2018, it develops and operates blockchain-based platforms used in lending, capital markets, and asset management.
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. is an Israeli public company. It provides satellite-based broadband communications technology, its main expertise being the development, manufacture, and marketing of ground-based satellite systems for global communication via satellites.
FIGR vs GILT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $156.4M | $152.7M |
| Net Profit | $89.6M | $6.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.8% |
| Operating Margin | 33.7% | 5.4% |
| Net Margin | 57.3% | 4.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.34 | $57016808.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $156.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $152.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $126.6M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $106.9M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $98.2M |
| Q3 25 | $89.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-5.2M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.7% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 29.6% |
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -4.0% |
| Q3 25 | 57.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -5.3% |
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $57016808.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $56622204.00 | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.1B | $64.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $466.8M | $56.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $315.8M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $575.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.40× | 0.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $64.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $93.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $87.4M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $70.1M |
| Q3 25 | $466.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $56.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $315.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $282.8M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $255.0M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $245.7M |
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $575.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $416.9M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $371.6M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $376.0M |
| Q3 25 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $49.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.55× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
