vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. (FIGR) and IHS Holding Ltd (IHS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IHS Holding Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($254.0M vs $156.4M, roughly 1.6× Figure Technology Solutions, Inc.).
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. is a financial technology company in Reno, Nevada, United States. Established in 2018, it develops and operates blockchain-based platforms used in lending, capital markets, and asset management.
IHS Towers is one of the largest independent owners, operators and developers of shared communications infrastructure in the world, with operations across Africa and Latin America. It is the fifth-largest independent multinational tower company in the world.
FIGR vs IHS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $156.4M | $254.0M |
| Net Profit | $89.6M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 83.6% |
| Operating Margin | 33.7% | — |
| Net Margin | 57.3% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | 0.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.34 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $254.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $156.4M | $455.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $433.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $439.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $253.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $420.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $435.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $417.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.6M | $147.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $32.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $30.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-205.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-124.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | 83.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 47.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 51.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 72.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 52.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 39.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | 35.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.3% | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -48.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -28.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -372.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.61 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.36 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.67 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.1B | $825.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $466.8M | $3.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $-89.8M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $4.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $825.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $647.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $531.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $629.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $578.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $397.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $445.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $333.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $466.8M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | $-89.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $38.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-98.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-184.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-314.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-284.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-308.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-163.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.40× | 85.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $49.3M | $246.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $178.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 70.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 26.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.55× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $718.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $246.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | $251.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $237.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $200.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $344.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $174.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $134.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $75.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $178.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $189.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $197.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $153.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $282.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $122.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $74.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $14.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 70.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 34.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 111.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.55× | 1.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.36× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.52× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
