vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. (FIGR) and INFINITY NATURAL RESOURCES, INC. (INR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($156.4M vs $115.5M, roughly 1.4× INFINITY NATURAL RESOURCES, INC.). Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.3% vs 17.3%, a 40.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. is a financial technology company in Reno, Nevada, United States. Established in 2018, it develops and operates blockchain-based platforms used in lending, capital markets, and asset management.
FIGR vs INR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $156.4M | $115.5M |
| Net Profit | $89.6M | $20.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 33.7% | 47.0% |
| Net Margin | 57.3% | 17.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.34 | $1.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $115.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $156.4M | $78.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $72.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $84.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $20.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.6M | $10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-34.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 47.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | 30.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -104.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.3% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -41.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | $0.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.18 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.1B | $2.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $466.8M | $55.0K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $307.1M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.40× | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $4.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $55.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $466.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $123.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $307.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $288.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-52.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $953.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $49.3M | $75.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.55× | 3.75× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $75.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | $42.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $70.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $74.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.55× | 4.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.91× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FIGR
Segment breakdown not available.
INR
| Oil Reserves | $54.0M | 47% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $46.8M | 41% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $14.7M | 13% |
