vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. (FIGR) and CENTRUS ENERGY CORP (LEU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($156.4M vs $146.2M, roughly 1.1× CENTRUS ENERGY CORP).
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. is a financial technology company in Reno, Nevada, United States. Established in 2018, it develops and operates blockchain-based platforms used in lending, capital markets, and asset management.
Centrus Energy Corp. is an American company that supplies nuclear fuel for use in nuclear power plants and works to develop and deploy centrifuge technology to produce enriched uranium for commercial and government uses, including for national security.
FIGR vs LEU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $156.4M | $146.2M |
| Net Profit | $89.6M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 23.9% |
| Operating Margin | 33.7% | 8.8% |
| Net Margin | 57.3% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | -3.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.34 | $0.52 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $146.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $156.4M | $74.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $154.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $73.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $151.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $189.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $43.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.6M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $28.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $27.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-6.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 45.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 40.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | -22.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -13.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -24.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.3% | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -8.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -14.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.52 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.59 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.89 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.1B | $2.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $466.8M | $1.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $765.1M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.40× | 1.54× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $833.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $653.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $671.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $194.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $227.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $209.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $466.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $390.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $389.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $472.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $83.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $86.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $86.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $765.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $363.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $359.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $213.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $161.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $76.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $76.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $33.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $591.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $668.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $750.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.40× | 3.23× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.82× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.56× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $49.3M | $-48.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-58.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -39.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 6.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.55× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $31.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-48.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $52.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $36.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $57.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-33.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-58.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $34.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $57.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-34.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | -39.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 47.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -59.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.55× | 2.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FIGR
Segment breakdown not available.
LEU
| Separative Work Units | $111.0M | 76% |
| Services | $21.8M | 15% |
| Other | $13.4M | 9% |
