vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. (FIGR) and Opera Ltd (OPRA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($156.4M vs $142.7M, roughly 1.1× Opera Ltd). Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.3% vs 12.8%, a 44.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. is a financial technology company in Reno, Nevada, United States. Established in 2018, it develops and operates blockchain-based platforms used in lending, capital markets, and asset management.
Opera is a multinational technology corporation headquartered in Oslo, Norway, with additional offices in Europe, China, and Africa. Opera offers a range of products and services that include PC and mobile web browsers, GameMaker and gaming portals, the Opera News content recommendation products, the Opera Ads platform, and a number of Web3 and e-commerce products and services. The company's total user base is 296 million monthly active users.
FIGR vs OPRA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $156.4M | $142.7M |
| Net Profit | $89.6M | $18.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 33.7% | 14.8% |
| Net Margin | 57.3% | 12.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.34 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $156.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $142.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $211.6M |
| Q3 25 | $89.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $34.1M |
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.6% |
| Q3 25 | 57.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.1% |
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.1B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $466.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | — |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $466.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $49.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.55× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
