vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. (FIGR) and TACTILE SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY INC (TCMD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($156.4M vs $103.6M, roughly 1.5× TACTILE SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY INC). Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.3% vs 10.3%, a 47.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. is a financial technology company in Reno, Nevada, United States. Established in 2018, it develops and operates blockchain-based platforms used in lending, capital markets, and asset management.
Dominion Voting Systems Corporation was a North American company that produced and sold electronic voting hardware and software, including voting machines and tabulators, in Canada and the United States.
FIGR vs TCMD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $156.4M | $103.6M |
| Net Profit | $89.6M | $10.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 78.2% |
| Operating Margin | 33.7% | 18.1% |
| Net Margin | 57.3% | 10.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 21.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 9.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.34 | $0.45 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $103.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $156.4M | $85.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $78.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $61.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $85.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $73.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $73.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $61.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $10.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.6M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 75.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 74.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 74.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 75.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 75.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 73.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 71.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -4.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.3% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.45 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.1B | $83.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $466.8M | $0 |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $218.9M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $273.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.40× | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $83.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $66.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $81.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $83.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $94.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $82.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $73.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $60.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q3 25 | $466.8M | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $27.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $27.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $28.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $218.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $204.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $194.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $205.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $216.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $207.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $200.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $193.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $273.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $259.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $273.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $280.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $297.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $287.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $278.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $272.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.40× | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.15× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $49.3M | $17.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $16.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 16.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.55× | 1.63× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $40.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $17.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $417.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $924.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $16.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $38.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $442.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 18.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.55× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.59× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.68× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.99× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FIGR
Segment breakdown not available.
TCMD
| Private Insurers | $57.6M | 56% |
| Medicare | $24.6M | 24% |
| Durable Medical Equipment Distributors | $14.1M | 14% |
| Veterans Administration | $7.3M | 7% |