vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) and HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC. (HIW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($203.4M vs $143.5M, roughly 1.4× FTAI Infrastructure Inc.). HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 14.6% vs -68.1%, a 82.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FTAI Infrastructure Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (77.7% vs -1.1%). Over the past eight quarters, FTAI Infrastructure Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (31.9% CAGR vs -1.9%).
FTAI Infrastructure Inc. owns, operates and invests in high-quality critical infrastructure assets across core sectors including transportation logistics, midstream energy, and power generation. It primarily serves North American markets, focusing on assets with stable long-term cash flows, contracted revenue streams, and strong market positions to deliver sustainable returns for stakeholders.
Highwoods Properties, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that owns, develops, acquires, and manages high-quality office properties primarily located in fast-growing metropolitan areas across the Southeastern and Mid-Atlantic regions of the United States. Its client base includes corporate tenants across diverse industry segments such as technology, healthcare, finance, and professional services.
FIP vs HIW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.5M | $203.4M |
| Net Profit | $-97.7M | $29.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -45.7% | 67.2% |
| Net Margin | -68.1% | 14.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 77.7% | -1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.6% | 1029.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.04 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $143.5M | $203.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.6M | $201.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.3M | $200.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.2M | $200.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.8M | $205.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.3M | $204.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.9M | $204.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $82.5M | $211.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-97.7M | $29.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-104.5M | $13.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-70.0M | $19.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.2M | $100.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-124.7M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-43.0M | $15.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-48.1M | $64.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-50.3M | $27.2M |
| Q4 25 | -45.7% | 67.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -70.8% | 67.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -56.4% | 68.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.8% | 67.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -152.7% | 65.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -51.7% | 67.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -56.4% | 68.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -58.8% | 66.7% |
| Q4 25 | -68.1% | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -74.4% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -57.2% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 125.0% | 49.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -154.4% | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -51.6% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -56.7% | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -60.9% | 12.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-1.04 | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.38 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.73 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.89 | $0.91 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.21 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.45 | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.52 | $0.59 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.54 | $0.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $57.4M | $27.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.8B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $21.3M | $2.4B |
| Total Assets | $5.7B | $6.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 176.99× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $57.4M | $27.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.7M | $26.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.6M | $21.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | $20.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.8M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.3M | $23.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.1M | $27.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.0M | $16.4M |
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $21.3M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $181.1M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $375.5M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $476.2M | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $202.7M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $370.8M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $394.8M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $402.5M | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | $5.7B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $6.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $6.0B |
| Q4 25 | 176.99× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.59× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.21× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.79× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.84× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.14× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.94× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.34× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.8M | $359.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-68.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -47.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 45.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 12.09× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-398.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | $359.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-24.4M | $96.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.2M | $116.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-85.7M | $46.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.1M | $403.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | $97.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-17.6M | $130.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.9M | $72.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-68.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-90.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-87.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-151.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-34.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-32.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-16.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | -47.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -64.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -71.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -157.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -42.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -37.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 45.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 68.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.71× | 0.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.30× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.66× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FIP
| Power Revenues | $45.9M | 32% |
| Rail Revenue | $44.6M | 31% |
| Service Other | $22.8M | 16% |
| Gas Revenues | $15.3M | 11% |
| Roadside Services Revenues | $11.5M | 8% |
| Rapauno | $1.2M | 1% |
HIW
| Raleigh NC | $45.6M | 22% |
| Nashville TN | $38.7M | 19% |
| Atlanta GA | $36.1M | 18% |
| Charlotte NC | $26.1M | 13% |
| Tampa FL | $22.2M | 11% |
| Orlando FL | $14.4M | 7% |
| Other | $11.4M | 6% |
| Richmond VA | $8.8M | 4% |
