vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) and KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC (KLIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($199.6M vs $143.5M, roughly 1.4× FTAI Infrastructure Inc.). KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 8.4% vs -68.1%, a 76.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FTAI Infrastructure Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (77.7% vs 20.2%). KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-11.6M vs $-68.6M).
FTAI Infrastructure Inc. owns, operates and invests in high-quality critical infrastructure assets across core sectors including transportation logistics, midstream energy, and power generation. It primarily serves North American markets, focusing on assets with stable long-term cash flows, contracted revenue streams, and strong market positions to deliver sustainable returns for stakeholders.
Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc. is a leading global provider of semiconductor packaging and assembly equipment, materials, and process solutions. It serves semiconductor manufacturers across automotive electronics, consumer devices, industrial systems, and high-performance computing markets, with core offerings covering wire bonding and advanced packaging technologies.
FIP vs KLIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.5M | $199.6M |
| Net Profit | $-97.7M | $16.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.6% |
| Operating Margin | -45.7% | 8.9% |
| Net Margin | -68.1% | 8.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 77.7% | 20.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.6% | -79.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.04 | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $199.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $143.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $16.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-97.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-104.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-70.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-124.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-43.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-48.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 49.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -45.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -70.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -56.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -152.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -51.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -56.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -68.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -74.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -57.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 125.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -154.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -51.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -56.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.04 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.38 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.73 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.89 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.21 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.45 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.52 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $57.4M | $481.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.8B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $21.3M | $825.0M |
| Total Assets | $5.7B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 176.99× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $481.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $57.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $825.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $181.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $375.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $476.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $202.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $370.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $394.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 176.99× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.59× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.21× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.79× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.84× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.14× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.94× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.8M | $-8.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-68.6M | $-11.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -47.8% | -5.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 45.9% | 1.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-398.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-24.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-85.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-17.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $-11.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-68.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-90.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-87.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-151.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-34.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-32.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | -47.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -64.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -71.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -157.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -42.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -37.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 45.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 68.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -0.53× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.71× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FIP
| Power Revenues | $45.9M | 32% |
| Rail Revenue | $44.6M | 31% |
| Service Other | $22.8M | 16% |
| Gas Revenues | $15.3M | 11% |
| Roadside Services Revenues | $11.5M | 8% |
| Rapauno | $1.2M | 1% |
KLIC
| Ball Bonding Equipment Segment | $110.3M | 55% |
| Aftermarket Products And Services APS Segment Post Cessation | $45.1M | 23% |
| Wedge Bonding Equipment Segment | $21.1M | 11% |
| Automotiveand Industrial | $13.6M | 7% |
| All Others Segment | $11.4M | 6% |
