vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) and Enpro Inc. (NPO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Enpro Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($295.4M vs $188.4M, roughly 1.6× FTAI Infrastructure Inc.). Enpro Inc. runs the higher net margin — -10.8% vs -79.7%, a 68.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FTAI Infrastructure Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (95.9% vs 14.3%). Over the past eight quarters, FTAI Infrastructure Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (49.0% CAGR vs 7.1%).
FTAI Infrastructure Inc. owns, operates and invests in high-quality critical infrastructure assets across core sectors including transportation logistics, midstream energy, and power generation. It primarily serves North American markets, focusing on assets with stable long-term cash flows, contracted revenue streams, and strong market positions to deliver sustainable returns for stakeholders.
Enpro is a US-based industrial technology company that designs and manufactures products and materials for technology-intensive sectors. The company serves industries such as semiconductors, aerospace, power generation, heavy-duty trucking, agricultural machinery, chemical processing, pulp and paper, and life sciences from 61 primary manufacturing facilities located in 12 countries, worldwide. It is organized under three segments: Sealing Technologies, Advanced Surface Technologies, and Engin...
FIP vs NPO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $188.4M | $295.4M |
| Net Profit | $-150.2M | $-32.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 42.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 11.2% |
| Net Margin | -79.7% | -10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 95.9% | 14.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -387.6% | -330.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.32 | $-1.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $188.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $143.5M | $295.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.6M | $286.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.3M | $288.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.2M | $273.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.8M | $258.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.3M | $260.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.9M | $271.9M |
| Q1 26 | $-150.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-97.7M | $-32.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-104.5M | $21.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-70.0M | $26.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.2M | $24.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-124.7M | $13.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-43.0M | $19.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-48.1M | $26.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 42.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 42.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -45.7% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -70.8% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -56.4% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.8% | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -152.7% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -51.7% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -56.4% | 17.7% |
| Q1 26 | -79.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -68.1% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -74.4% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -57.2% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 125.0% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -154.4% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -51.6% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -56.7% | 9.8% |
| Q1 26 | $-1.32 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.04 | $-1.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.38 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.73 | $1.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.89 | $1.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.21 | $0.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.45 | $0.94 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.52 | $1.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $37.9M | $114.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $655.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-122.5K | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $5.7B | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $37.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $57.4M | $114.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.7M | $132.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.6M | $107.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | $240.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.8M | $236.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.3M | $206.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.1M | $175.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $655.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $640.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | $-122.5K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $181.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $375.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $476.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $202.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $370.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $394.8M | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $2.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 176.99× | 0.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.59× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.21× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.79× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.84× | 0.45× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.14× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.94× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-69.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-69.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-24.4M | $65.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.2M | $52.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-85.7M | $21.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.1M | $59.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | $54.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-17.6M | $43.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-68.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-90.7M | $53.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-87.5M | $42.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-151.7M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-34.3M | $49.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.7M | $48.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-32.1M | $38.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -47.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -64.5% | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -71.6% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -157.7% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -42.4% | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.0% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -37.9% | 14.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 45.9% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.2% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 68.6% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.5% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.2% | 1.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.71× | 0.86× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.73× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.62× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FIP
Segment breakdown not available.
NPO
| Sealing Technologies Segment | $187.0M | 63% |
| General Industrial | $71.3M | 24% |
| Power Generation | $19.9M | 7% |
| Oiland Gas Market | $15.0M | 5% |
| Semiconductors | $2.2M | 1% |
