vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) and TANGER INC. (SKT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

TANGER INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($150.4M vs $143.5M, roughly 1.0× FTAI Infrastructure Inc.). TANGER INC. runs the higher net margin — 19.6% vs -68.1%, a 87.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FTAI Infrastructure Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (77.7% vs 11.1%). Over the past eight quarters, FTAI Infrastructure Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (31.9% CAGR vs 8.0%).

FTAI Infrastructure Inc. owns, operates and invests in high-quality critical infrastructure assets across core sectors including transportation logistics, midstream energy, and power generation. It primarily serves North American markets, focusing on assets with stable long-term cash flows, contracted revenue streams, and strong market positions to deliver sustainable returns for stakeholders.

Tanger Inc. is a real estate investment trust headquartered in Greensboro, North Carolina, that invests in open air outlet and lifestyle shopping centers in the United States and Canada.

FIP vs SKT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
SKT
SKT
1.0× larger
SKT
$150.4M
$143.5M
FIP
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
FIP
FIP
+66.6% gap
FIP
77.7%
11.1%
SKT
Higher net margin
SKT
SKT
87.6% more per $
SKT
19.6%
-68.1%
FIP
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
FIP
FIP
Annualised
FIP
31.9%
8.0%
SKT

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
FIP
FIP
SKT
SKT
Revenue
$143.5M
$150.4M
Net Profit
$-97.7M
$29.4M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
-45.7%
Net Margin
-68.1%
19.6%
Revenue YoY
77.7%
11.1%
Net Profit YoY
21.6%
47.1%
EPS (diluted)
$-1.04
$1.05

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FIP
FIP
SKT
SKT
Q1 26
$150.4M
Q4 25
$143.5M
$151.0M
Q3 25
$140.6M
$145.2M
Q2 25
$122.3M
$140.7M
Q1 25
$96.2M
$135.4M
Q4 24
$80.8M
$132.2M
Q3 24
$83.3M
$133.0M
Q2 24
$84.9M
$129.0M
Net Profit
FIP
FIP
SKT
SKT
Q1 26
$29.4M
Q4 25
$-97.7M
Q3 25
$-104.5M
$32.0M
Q2 25
$-70.0M
$30.1M
Q1 25
$120.2M
$19.2M
Q4 24
$-124.7M
Q3 24
$-43.0M
$24.9M
Q2 24
$-48.1M
$24.8M
Operating Margin
FIP
FIP
SKT
SKT
Q1 26
Q4 25
-45.7%
Q3 25
-70.8%
20.1%
Q2 25
-56.4%
20.1%
Q1 25
81.8%
13.0%
Q4 24
-152.7%
Q3 24
-51.7%
17.8%
Q2 24
-56.4%
17.8%
Net Margin
FIP
FIP
SKT
SKT
Q1 26
19.6%
Q4 25
-68.1%
Q3 25
-74.4%
22.1%
Q2 25
-57.2%
21.4%
Q1 25
125.0%
14.2%
Q4 24
-154.4%
Q3 24
-51.6%
18.7%
Q2 24
-56.7%
19.3%
EPS (diluted)
FIP
FIP
SKT
SKT
Q1 26
$1.05
Q4 25
$-1.04
Q3 25
$-1.38
$0.28
Q2 25
$-0.73
$0.26
Q1 25
$0.89
$0.17
Q4 24
$-1.21
Q3 24
$-0.45
$0.22
Q2 24
$-0.52
$0.22

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FIP
FIP
SKT
SKT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$57.4M
$227.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$3.8B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$21.3M
$697.8M
Total Assets
$5.7B
$2.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
176.99×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FIP
FIP
SKT
SKT
Q1 26
$227.4M
Q4 25
$57.4M
$18.1M
Q3 25
$34.7M
$13.0M
Q2 25
$33.6M
$9.7M
Q1 25
$26.3M
$10.2M
Q4 24
$27.8M
$47.0M
Q3 24
$20.3M
$11.1M
Q2 24
$33.1M
$11.3M
Total Debt
FIP
FIP
SKT
SKT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$3.8B
Q3 25
$3.7B
$1.6B
Q2 25
$3.1B
$1.5B
Q1 25
$2.8B
$1.6B
Q4 24
$1.6B
$1.4B
Q3 24
$1.5B
$1.4B
Q2 24
$1.6B
$1.5B
Stockholders' Equity
FIP
FIP
SKT
SKT
Q1 26
$697.8M
Q4 25
$21.3M
Q3 25
$181.1M
$703.6M
Q2 25
$375.5M
$635.2M
Q1 25
$476.2M
$633.9M
Q4 24
$202.7M
$652.4M
Q3 24
$370.8M
$568.3M
Q2 24
$394.8M
$553.7M
Total Assets
FIP
FIP
SKT
SKT
Q1 26
$2.8B
Q4 25
$5.7B
Q3 25
$5.5B
$2.6B
Q2 25
$4.4B
$2.5B
Q1 25
$4.1B
$2.5B
Q4 24
$2.4B
$2.4B
Q3 24
$2.4B
$2.3B
Q2 24
$2.5B
$2.3B
Debt / Equity
FIP
FIP
SKT
SKT
Q1 26
Q4 25
176.99×
Q3 25
20.59×
2.29×
Q2 25
8.21×
2.40×
Q1 25
5.79×
2.47×
Q4 24
7.84×
2.18×
Q3 24
4.14×
2.51×
Q2 24
3.94×
2.64×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FIP
FIP
SKT
SKT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-2.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-68.6M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-47.8%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
45.9%
6.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-398.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FIP
FIP
SKT
SKT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-2.8M
Q3 25
$-24.4M
$74.3M
Q2 25
$-5.2M
$82.0M
Q1 25
$-85.7M
$41.4M
Q4 24
$-8.1M
Q3 24
$14.2M
$65.2M
Q2 24
$-17.6M
$72.8M
Free Cash Flow
FIP
FIP
SKT
SKT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-68.6M
Q3 25
$-90.7M
Q2 25
$-87.5M
Q1 25
$-151.7M
Q4 24
$-34.3M
Q3 24
$-11.7M
Q2 24
$-32.1M
FCF Margin
FIP
FIP
SKT
SKT
Q1 26
Q4 25
-47.8%
Q3 25
-64.5%
Q2 25
-71.6%
Q1 25
-157.7%
Q4 24
-42.4%
Q3 24
-14.0%
Q2 24
-37.9%
Capex Intensity
FIP
FIP
SKT
SKT
Q1 26
6.6%
Q4 25
45.9%
Q3 25
47.2%
Q2 25
67.3%
Q1 25
68.6%
Q4 24
32.5%
Q3 24
31.1%
Q2 24
17.2%
Cash Conversion
FIP
FIP
SKT
SKT
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
2.32×
Q2 25
2.73×
Q1 25
-0.71×
2.16×
Q4 24
Q3 24
2.62×
Q2 24
2.93×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FIP
FIP

Power Revenues$45.9M32%
Rail Revenue$44.6M31%
Service Other$22.8M16%
Gas Revenues$15.3M11%
Roadside Services Revenues$11.5M8%
Rapauno$1.2M1%

SKT
SKT

Rental revenue$143.5M95%
Other revenue$4.7M3%
Management, leasing and other services$2.2M1%

Related Comparisons