vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) and Youlife Group Inc. (YOUL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FTAI Infrastructure Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($188.4M vs $127.5M, roughly 1.5× Youlife Group Inc.). Youlife Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.1% vs -79.7%, a 83.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
FTAI Infrastructure Inc. owns, operates and invests in high-quality critical infrastructure assets across core sectors including transportation logistics, midstream energy, and power generation. It primarily serves North American markets, focusing on assets with stable long-term cash flows, contracted revenue streams, and strong market positions to deliver sustainable returns for stakeholders.
FIP vs YOUL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $188.4M | $127.5M |
| Net Profit | $-150.2M | $5.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 14.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.0% |
| Net Margin | -79.7% | 4.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 95.9% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -387.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.32 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $188.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $143.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.3M | $127.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | $-150.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-97.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-104.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-70.0M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-124.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-43.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-48.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -45.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -70.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -56.4% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -152.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -51.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -56.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | -79.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -68.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -74.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -57.2% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 125.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -154.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -51.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -56.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | $-1.32 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.04 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.38 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.73 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.89 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.21 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.45 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.52 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $37.9M | $22.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-122.5K | $-55.7M |
| Total Assets | $5.7B | $148.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $37.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $57.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.6M | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | $-122.5K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $181.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $375.5M | $-55.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $476.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $202.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $370.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $394.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | $148.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 176.99× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.59× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.21× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.79× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.84× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.14× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.94× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-69.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-69.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-24.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-85.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-17.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-68.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-90.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-87.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-151.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-34.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-32.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -47.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -64.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -71.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -157.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -42.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -37.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 45.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 68.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.71× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
