vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) and TechnipFMC plc (FTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Fidelity National Information Services is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8B vs $2.5B, roughly 1.1× TechnipFMC plc). Fidelity National Information Services runs the higher net margin — 18.2% vs 10.5%, a 7.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TechnipFMC plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.6% vs 8.1%). Fidelity National Information Services produced more free cash flow last quarter ($739.0M vs $276.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Fidelity National Information Services's revenue compounded faster (6.8% CAGR vs 3.5%).

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is an American multinational corporation which offers a wide range of financial products and services. FIS is most known for its development of Financial Technology, or FinTech. Annually, FIS facilitates the movement of roughly US$9 trillion through the processing of approximately 75 billion transactions in service to more than 20,000 clients around the globe.

TechnipFMC plc is a French-American, UK-domiciled global oil and gas company that provides services for the energy industry. The company was formed by the merger of FMC Technologies of the United States and Technip of France that was announced in 2016 and completed in 2017.

FIS vs FTI — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FIS
FIS
1.1× larger
FIS
$2.8B
$2.5B
FTI
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
FTI
FTI
+3.5% gap
FTI
11.6%
8.1%
FIS
Higher net margin
FIS
FIS
7.7% more per $
FIS
18.2%
10.5%
FTI
More free cash flow
FIS
FIS
$462.1M more FCF
FIS
$739.0M
$276.9M
FTI
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
FIS
FIS
Annualised
FIS
6.8%
3.5%
FTI

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
FIS
FIS
FTI
FTI
Revenue
$2.8B
$2.5B
Net Profit
$511.0M
$260.5M
Gross Margin
38.3%
Operating Margin
18.8%
14.0%
Net Margin
18.2%
10.5%
Revenue YoY
8.1%
11.6%
Net Profit YoY
97.3%
7.3%
EPS (diluted)
$0.98
$0.64

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FIS
FIS
FTI
FTI
Q1 26
$2.5B
Q4 25
$2.8B
$2.5B
Q3 25
$2.7B
$2.6B
Q2 25
$2.6B
$2.5B
Q1 25
$2.5B
$2.2B
Q4 24
$2.6B
$2.4B
Q3 24
$2.6B
$2.3B
Q2 24
$2.5B
$2.3B
Net Profit
FIS
FIS
FTI
FTI
Q1 26
$260.5M
Q4 25
$511.0M
$242.7M
Q3 25
$264.0M
$309.7M
Q2 25
$-470.0M
$269.5M
Q1 25
$77.0M
$142.0M
Q4 24
$259.0M
$224.7M
Q3 24
$224.0M
$274.6M
Q2 24
$243.0M
$186.5M
Gross Margin
FIS
FIS
FTI
FTI
Q1 26
Q4 25
38.3%
Q3 25
37.8%
Q2 25
36.4%
23.1%
Q1 25
34.7%
20.5%
Q4 24
36.9%
Q3 24
38.0%
Q2 24
38.2%
21.2%
Operating Margin
FIS
FIS
FTI
FTI
Q1 26
14.0%
Q4 25
18.8%
12.6%
Q3 25
16.8%
16.5%
Q2 25
15.6%
15.9%
Q1 25
13.7%
12.5%
Q4 24
18.5%
11.3%
Q3 24
19.1%
13.7%
Q2 24
15.2%
13.3%
Net Margin
FIS
FIS
FTI
FTI
Q1 26
10.5%
Q4 25
18.2%
9.6%
Q3 25
9.7%
11.7%
Q2 25
-18.0%
10.6%
Q1 25
3.0%
6.4%
Q4 24
10.0%
9.5%
Q3 24
8.7%
11.7%
Q2 24
9.8%
8.0%
EPS (diluted)
FIS
FIS
FTI
FTI
Q1 26
$0.64
Q4 25
$0.98
$0.58
Q3 25
$0.50
$0.75
Q2 25
$-0.90
$0.64
Q1 25
$0.15
$0.33
Q4 24
$0.51
$0.51
Q3 24
$0.41
$0.63
Q2 24
$0.44
$0.42

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FIS
FIS
FTI
FTI
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$599.0M
$960.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$9.1B
$384.0M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$13.9B
Total Assets
$33.5B
$10.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.65×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FIS
FIS
FTI
FTI
Q1 26
$960.8M
Q4 25
$599.0M
$1.0B
Q3 25
$571.0M
$876.6M
Q2 25
$581.0M
$950.0M
Q1 25
$805.0M
$1.2B
Q4 24
$834.0M
$1.2B
Q3 24
$1.3B
Q2 24
$2.1B
Total Debt
FIS
FIS
FTI
FTI
Q1 26
$384.0M
Q4 25
$9.1B
$430.0M
Q3 25
$8.9B
$438.0M
Q2 25
$8.9B
$696.3M
Q1 25
$8.7B
$904.9M
Q4 24
$9.7B
$885.2M
Q3 24
$10.5B
$966.7M
Q2 24
$10.6B
$968.4M
Stockholders' Equity
FIS
FIS
FTI
FTI
Q1 26
Q4 25
$13.9B
$3.4B
Q3 25
$13.9B
$3.3B
Q2 25
$14.2B
$3.3B
Q1 25
$15.1B
$3.1B
Q4 24
$15.7B
$3.1B
Q3 24
$16.6B
$3.3B
Q2 24
$17.0B
$3.0B
Total Assets
FIS
FIS
FTI
FTI
Q1 26
$10.1B
Q4 25
$33.5B
$10.1B
Q3 25
$33.0B
$10.3B
Q2 25
$33.4B
$10.1B
Q1 25
$32.8B
$10.0B
Q4 24
$33.8B
$9.9B
Q3 24
$34.3B
$9.7B
Q2 24
$34.6B
$9.2B
Debt / Equity
FIS
FIS
FTI
FTI
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.65×
0.13×
Q3 25
0.64×
0.13×
Q2 25
0.63×
0.21×
Q1 25
0.57×
0.29×
Q4 24
0.62×
0.29×
Q3 24
0.63×
0.30×
Q2 24
0.62×
0.33×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FIS
FIS
FTI
FTI
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$758.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$739.0M
$276.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
26.3%
11.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.7%
2.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.48×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$2.5B
$1.3B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FIS
FIS
FTI
FTI
Q1 26
Q4 25
$758.0M
$453.6M
Q3 25
$1.0B
$525.1M
Q2 25
$382.0M
$344.2M
Q1 25
$457.0M
$441.7M
Q4 24
$782.0M
$578.9M
Q3 24
$641.0M
$277.9M
Q2 24
$546.0M
$230.9M
Free Cash Flow
FIS
FIS
FTI
FTI
Q1 26
$276.9M
Q4 25
$739.0M
$359.1M
Q3 25
$952.0M
$447.8M
Q2 25
$343.0M
$260.6M
Q1 25
$420.0M
$379.9M
Q4 24
$764.0M
$452.7M
Q3 24
$605.0M
$225.3M
Q2 24
$530.0M
$180.1M
FCF Margin
FIS
FIS
FTI
FTI
Q1 26
11.1%
Q4 25
26.3%
14.3%
Q3 25
35.0%
16.9%
Q2 25
13.1%
10.3%
Q1 25
16.6%
17.0%
Q4 24
29.4%
19.1%
Q3 24
23.5%
9.6%
Q2 24
21.3%
7.7%
Capex Intensity
FIS
FIS
FTI
FTI
Q1 26
2.2%
Q4 25
0.7%
3.8%
Q3 25
2.2%
2.9%
Q2 25
1.5%
3.3%
Q1 25
1.5%
2.8%
Q4 24
0.7%
5.3%
Q3 24
1.4%
2.2%
Q2 24
0.6%
2.2%
Cash Conversion
FIS
FIS
FTI
FTI
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.48×
1.87×
Q3 25
3.83×
1.70×
Q2 25
1.28×
Q1 25
5.94×
3.11×
Q4 24
3.02×
2.58×
Q3 24
2.86×
1.01×
Q2 24
2.25×
1.24×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FIS
FIS

Banking Solutions$1.6B57%
Other$701.0M25%
Capital Market Solutions$508.0M18%

FTI
FTI

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons