vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of FISERV INC (FISV) and Kimberly-Clark (KMB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

FISERV INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.3B vs $4.2B, roughly 1.3× Kimberly-Clark). Kimberly-Clark runs the higher net margin — 16.2% vs 15.3%, a 0.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimberly-Clark posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.7% vs 0.6%). Over the past eight quarters, FISERV INC's revenue compounded faster (4.0% CAGR vs -9.0%).

Fiserv, Inc. is an American multinational financial technology company headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The company processes debit and credit card transactions, loyalty programs, loans, electronic bill pay, wires and ACH transfers, check deposits, and ATM transactions on behalf of banking institutions. The company also produces debit and credit cards and point of sale terminals.

Kimberly-Clark Corporation is an American multinational consumer goods and personal care corporation that produces mostly paper-based consumer products. The company manufactures sanitary paper products and surgical & medical instruments. Kimberly-Clark brand name products include Kleenex facial tissue, Kotex feminine hygiene products, Cottonelle, Scott and Andrex toilet paper, Wypall utility wipes, KimWipes scientific cleaning wipes and Huggies disposable diapers and baby wipes.

FISV vs KMB — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FISV
FISV
1.3× larger
FISV
$5.3B
$4.2B
KMB
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KMB
KMB
+2.1% gap
KMB
2.7%
0.6%
FISV
Higher net margin
KMB
KMB
0.9% more per $
KMB
16.2%
15.3%
FISV
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
FISV
FISV
Annualised
FISV
4.0%
-9.0%
KMB

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
FISV
FISV
KMB
KMB
Revenue
$5.3B
$4.2B
Net Profit
$811.0M
$675.0M
Gross Margin
36.8%
Operating Margin
24.4%
18.1%
Net Margin
15.3%
16.2%
Revenue YoY
0.6%
2.7%
Net Profit YoY
-13.5%
17.3%
EPS (diluted)
$1.51
$2.00

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FISV
FISV
KMB
KMB
Q1 26
$4.2B
Q4 25
$5.3B
$3.3B
Q3 25
$5.3B
$4.2B
Q2 25
$5.5B
$4.2B
Q1 25
$5.1B
$4.8B
Q4 24
$5.3B
$4.9B
Q3 24
$5.2B
$5.0B
Q2 24
$5.1B
$5.0B
Net Profit
FISV
FISV
KMB
KMB
Q1 26
$675.0M
Q4 25
$811.0M
$499.0M
Q3 25
$792.0M
$446.0M
Q2 25
$1.0B
$509.0M
Q1 25
$851.0M
$567.0M
Q4 24
$938.0M
$447.0M
Q3 24
$564.0M
$907.0M
Q2 24
$894.0M
$544.0M
Gross Margin
FISV
FISV
KMB
KMB
Q1 26
36.8%
Q4 25
37.7%
Q3 25
36.0%
Q2 25
35.0%
Q1 25
35.8%
Q4 24
34.0%
Q3 24
36.0%
Q2 24
36.0%
Operating Margin
FISV
FISV
KMB
KMB
Q1 26
18.1%
Q4 25
24.4%
11.2%
Q3 25
27.3%
15.0%
Q2 25
30.7%
14.2%
Q1 25
27.2%
15.9%
Q4 24
31.8%
11.1%
Q3 24
30.7%
23.3%
Q2 24
28.0%
13.0%
Net Margin
FISV
FISV
KMB
KMB
Q1 26
16.2%
Q4 25
15.3%
15.1%
Q3 25
15.0%
10.7%
Q2 25
18.6%
12.2%
Q1 25
16.6%
11.7%
Q4 24
17.9%
9.1%
Q3 24
10.8%
18.3%
Q2 24
17.5%
10.8%
EPS (diluted)
FISV
FISV
KMB
KMB
Q1 26
$2.00
Q4 25
$1.51
$1.50
Q3 25
$1.46
$1.34
Q2 25
$1.86
$1.53
Q1 25
$1.51
$1.70
Q4 24
$1.63
$1.34
Q3 24
$0.98
$2.69
Q2 24
$1.53
$1.61

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FISV
FISV
KMB
KMB
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$798.0M
$542.0K
Total DebtLower is stronger
$27.8B
$6.5M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$25.8B
$1.9M
Total Assets
$80.1B
$17.2M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.08×
3.38×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FISV
FISV
KMB
KMB
Q1 26
$542.0K
Q4 25
$798.0M
$688.0M
Q3 25
$1.1B
$617.0M
Q2 25
$999.0M
$634.0M
Q1 25
$1.2B
$563.0M
Q4 24
$1.2B
$1.0B
Q3 24
$1.2B
$1.1B
Q2 24
$1.2B
$1.2B
Total Debt
FISV
FISV
KMB
KMB
Q1 26
$6.5M
Q4 25
$27.8B
$6.5B
Q3 25
$28.9B
$6.5B
Q2 25
$28.1B
$6.5B
Q1 25
$27.0B
$6.5B
Q4 24
$23.7B
$6.9B
Q3 24
$24.1B
$6.9B
Q2 24
$24.4B
$7.2B
Stockholders' Equity
FISV
FISV
KMB
KMB
Q1 26
$1.9M
Q4 25
$25.8B
$1.5B
Q3 25
$25.1B
$1.3B
Q2 25
$25.2B
$1.3B
Q1 25
$25.9B
$1.1B
Q4 24
$27.1B
$840.0M
Q3 24
$27.8B
$1.3B
Q2 24
$28.2B
$1.1B
Total Assets
FISV
FISV
KMB
KMB
Q1 26
$17.2M
Q4 25
$80.1B
$17.1B
Q3 25
$79.4B
$16.9B
Q2 25
$81.5B
$16.8B
Q1 25
$80.4B
$16.3B
Q4 24
$77.2B
$16.5B
Q3 24
$79.8B
$17.2B
Q2 24
$93.4B
$17.3B
Debt / Equity
FISV
FISV
KMB
KMB
Q1 26
3.38×
Q4 25
1.08×
4.31×
Q3 25
1.15×
4.86×
Q2 25
1.11×
5.09×
Q1 25
1.04×
5.89×
Q4 24
0.88×
8.18×
Q3 24
0.87×
5.36×
Q2 24
0.87×
6.30×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FISV
FISV
KMB
KMB
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$1.9B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$1.5B
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
28.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
8.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.40×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$4.3B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FISV
FISV
KMB
KMB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.9B
$972.0M
Q3 25
$1.8B
$708.0M
Q2 25
$1.7B
$770.0M
Q1 25
$648.0M
$327.0M
Q4 24
$2.2B
$817.0M
Q3 24
$2.2B
$958.0M
Q2 24
$1.3B
$1.0B
Free Cash Flow
FISV
FISV
KMB
KMB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.5B
$575.0M
Q3 25
$1.3B
$368.0M
Q2 25
$1.2B
$573.0M
Q1 25
$313.0M
$123.0M
Q4 24
$1.8B
$608.0M
Q3 24
$1.8B
$798.0M
Q2 24
$993.0M
$863.0M
FCF Margin
FISV
FISV
KMB
KMB
Q1 26
Q4 25
28.4%
17.5%
Q3 25
24.7%
8.9%
Q2 25
21.5%
13.8%
Q1 25
6.1%
2.5%
Q4 24
34.7%
12.3%
Q3 24
35.2%
16.1%
Q2 24
19.4%
17.2%
Capex Intensity
FISV
FISV
KMB
KMB
Q1 26
Q4 25
8.4%
12.1%
Q3 25
9.6%
8.2%
Q2 25
8.7%
4.7%
Q1 25
6.5%
4.2%
Q4 24
7.6%
4.2%
Q3 24
7.7%
3.2%
Q2 24
6.8%
3.1%
Cash Conversion
FISV
FISV
KMB
KMB
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.40×
1.95×
Q3 25
2.28×
1.59×
Q2 25
1.62×
1.51×
Q1 25
0.76×
0.58×
Q4 24
2.37×
1.83×
Q3 24
3.97×
1.06×
Q2 24
1.50×
1.88×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FISV
FISV

Small Business$1.7B32%
Products$1.0B19%
Digital Payments$960.0M18%
Issuing$792.0M15%
Enterprise$587.0M11%
Processing$265.0M5%
Affiliated Entity$18.0M0%

KMB
KMB

NA$2.7B64%
IPC$1.5B36%

Related Comparisons