vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Five9, Inc. (FIVN) and UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC (UTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Five9, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($300.3M vs $221.4M, roughly 1.4× UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC). On growth, Five9, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.8% vs 6.7%). Over the past eight quarters, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC's revenue compounded faster (11.7% CAGR vs 10.3%).
Five9, Inc. is a leading global provider of cloud-native contact center software and solutions. It serves enterprises of all sizes across retail, healthcare, financial services, and technology sectors, offering omnichannel customer engagement tools, AI-powered automation, workforce management, and analytics to boost customer experience and operational efficiency.
Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) is a private for-profit system of technical colleges in the United States. It was established in 1965 by Robert Sweet.
FIVN vs UTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $300.3M | $221.4M |
| Net Profit | — | $433.0K |
| Gross Margin | 55.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 6.6% | 0.2% |
| Net Margin | — | 0.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.8% | 6.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -60.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.22 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $221.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $300.3M | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $285.8M | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $283.3M | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $279.7M | $207.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $278.7M | $201.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $264.2M | $196.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $252.1M | $177.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $433.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.0M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.0K | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.5M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.8M | $5.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 55.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 54.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 56.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 53.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.6% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.9% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.8% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.7% | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.7% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.1% | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.22 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.21 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.17 | $0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $232.1M | $162.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $127.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $785.8M | $339.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $852.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.38× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $162.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $232.1M | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $193.4M | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $205.5M | $70.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.3M | $96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.5M | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $291.0M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $175.7M | $115.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $127.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $94.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $120.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $125.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $137.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $339.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $785.8M | $335.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $775.3M | $328.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $717.4M | $306.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $664.3M | $293.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $622.2M | $280.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $565.6M | $260.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $525.9M | $239.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $852.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $826.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $740.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $720.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $753.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $744.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $706.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.57× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $83.6M | $7.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $77.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 25.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 16.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $201.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $83.6M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $59.2M | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.4M | $-789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.8M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.1M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.9M | $10.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $77.3M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.7M | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.6M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.7M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.5M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.7M | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.1M | $3.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.8% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.0% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.6% | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.7% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.4% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 4.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 16.33× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.29× | 3.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.38× | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 84.00× | -0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.