vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FLEX LTD. (FLEX) and GE Vernova (GEV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GE Vernova is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.3B vs $7.1B, roughly 1.3× FLEX LTD.). GE Vernova runs the higher net margin — 50.9% vs 3.4%, a 47.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GE Vernova posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.3% vs 7.7%). GE Vernova produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.8B vs $272.0M). Over the past eight quarters, FLEX LTD.'s revenue compounded faster (25.2% CAGR vs 6.7%).
Flex Ltd. is a Singaporean–American multinational manufacturing company. It is the third largest global electronics manufacturing services (EMS), original design manufacturer (ODM) company by revenue, behind only Pegatron for what concerns original equipment manufacturers. Flex's U.S. corporate headquarters are located in Austin, Texas. The company has manufacturing operations in over 30 countries, totaling about 172,000 employees.
GE Vernova, Inc. is an energy equipment manufacturing and services company headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The company operates through three main segments: Power, which designs, manufactures, and services gas, nuclear, hydro, and steam technologies; Wind, which provides onshore and offshore wind turbines and blades; and Electrification, which offers grid solutions, power conversion, solar and storage solutions, and digital technologies for the transmission, distribution, and manag...
FLEX vs GEV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.1B | $9.3B |
| Net Profit | $239.0M | $4.8B |
| Gross Margin | 9.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 50.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.7% | 16.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.1% | 5.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.64 | $17.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.1B | $11.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.8B | $10.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.6B | $9.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4B | $8.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3B | $8.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $239.0M | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $199.0M | $452.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $192.0M | $514.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $222.0M | $254.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $263.0M | $484.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $214.0M | $-96.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $139.0M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.6% | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.1% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | 20.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.7% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | -4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 6.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 50.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 33.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 15.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $17.44 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.64 | $13.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.52 | $1.64 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.50 | $1.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $0.91 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.67 | $1.75 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.54 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.34 | $4.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.1B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.1B | — |
| Total Assets | $20.8B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.87× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $11.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $8.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $8.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0B | $8.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $9.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | $9.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.8B | $63.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.5B | $54.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.1B | $53.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.4B | $51.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.3B | $51.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.6B | $50.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.7B | $48.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.87× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.64× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $420.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $272.0M | $4.8B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.9% | 51.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.76× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.2B | $7.5B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $420.0M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $453.0M | $980.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $399.0M | $367.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $433.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $413.0M | $921.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $319.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $340.0M | $979.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $272.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $303.0M | $733.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $266.0M | $194.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $321.0M | $975.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $301.0M | $571.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.0M | $968.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $229.0M | $822.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 10.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.76× | 0.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.28× | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.08× | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.95× | 4.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.57× | 1.90× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.45× | 0.76× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FLEX
| Flex Reliability Solutions FRS | $3.2B | 46% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $2.7B | 38% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.1B | 16% |
GEV
Segment breakdown not available.
