vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FLEX LTD. (FLEX) and JONES LANG LASALLE INC (JLL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JONES LANG LASALLE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.6B vs $7.1B, roughly 1.1× FLEX LTD.). JONES LANG LASALLE INC runs the higher net margin — 5.3% vs 3.4%, a 1.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JONES LANG LASALLE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.7% vs 7.7%). JONES LANG LASALLE INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($934.6M vs $272.0M). Over the past eight quarters, FLEX LTD.'s revenue compounded faster (25.2% CAGR vs 16.3%).
Flex Ltd. is a Singaporean–American multinational manufacturing company. It is the third largest global electronics manufacturing services (EMS), original design manufacturer (ODM) company by revenue, behind only Pegatron for what concerns original equipment manufacturers. Flex's U.S. corporate headquarters are located in Austin, Texas. The company has manufacturing operations in over 30 countries, totaling about 172,000 employees.
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) is a global real estate services company headquartered in Chicago. The company has offices in 80 countries. It offers investment management services worldwide, including services to institutional and retail investors, and to high-net-worth individuals, as well as technology products through JLL Technologies, and venture capital investments through its PropTech fund, JLL Spark. The company is ranked 188 on the Fortune 500.
FLEX vs JLL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.1B | $7.6B |
| Net Profit | $239.0M | $401.7M |
| Gross Margin | 9.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.5% | 6.7% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 5.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.7% | 11.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.1% | 66.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.64 | $8.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $7.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.1B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.8B | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.6B | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4B | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6B | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5B | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3B | $5.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $401.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $239.0M | $401.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $199.0M | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $192.0M | $110.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $222.0M | $57.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $263.0M | $241.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $214.0M | $155.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $139.0M | $84.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 6.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 1.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.34 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.64 | $8.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.52 | $4.61 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.50 | $2.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $1.14 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.67 | $4.98 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.54 | $3.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.34 | $1.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.1B | $599.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.1B | $7.6B |
| Total Assets | $20.8B | $17.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.87× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $599.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $599.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $428.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $401.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $432.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $416.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $437.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $424.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $7.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $7.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $17.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.8B | $17.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.5B | $17.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.1B | $17.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.4B | $16.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.3B | $16.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.6B | $17.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.7B | $15.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.87× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.64× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $420.0M | $-162.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $272.0M | $934.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.9% | 12.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.76× | -0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.2B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-162.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $420.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $453.0M | $617.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $399.0M | $332.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $433.0M | $-767.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $413.0M | $927.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $319.0M | $261.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $340.0M | $273.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $934.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $272.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $303.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $266.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $321.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $301.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $229.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 12.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -0.41× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.76× | 2.52× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.28× | 2.77× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.08× | 3.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.95× | -13.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.57× | 3.84× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.49× | 1.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.45× | 3.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FLEX
| Flex Reliability Solutions FRS | $3.2B | 46% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $2.7B | 38% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.1B | 16% |
JLL
| Real Estate Management Services | $5.6B | 73% |
| Leasing Advisory | $1.0B | 13% |
| Capital Markets Services | $854.4M | 11% |
| Investment Management | $133.1M | 2% |
| Software and Technology Solutions | $60.7M | 1% |
