vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FLEX LTD. (FLEX) and Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FLEX LTD. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.1B vs $57.8M, roughly 122.2× Nano Dimension Ltd.). FLEX LTD. runs the higher net margin — 3.4% vs -171.1%, a 174.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. FLEX LTD. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($272.0M vs $-21.1M).
Flex Ltd. is a Singaporean–American multinational manufacturing company. It is the third largest global electronics manufacturing services (EMS), original design manufacturer (ODM) company by revenue, behind only Pegatron for what concerns original equipment manufacturers. Flex's U.S. corporate headquarters are located in Austin, Texas. The company has manufacturing operations in over 30 countries, totaling about 172,000 employees.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
FLEX vs NNDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2026 vs Q4 2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.1B | $57.8M |
| Net Profit | $239.0M | $-98.8M |
| Gross Margin | 9.6% | 43.1% |
| Operating Margin | 5.5% | -155.1% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | -171.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.7% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.64 | $-0.45 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6B | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3B | $28.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $239.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $199.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $192.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $222.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $263.0M | $-98.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $214.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $139.0M | $-79.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $395.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | 43.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | 45.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | -155.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -171.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | -279.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.64 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.52 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.67 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.54 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.34 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.91 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.1B | $317.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.1B | $860.0M |
| Total Assets | $20.8B | $902.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.87× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $317.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $231.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $860.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | $870.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $20.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.3B | $902.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.7B | $911.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.87× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.61× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $420.0M | $-18.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $272.0M | $-21.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.9% | -36.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.76× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.2B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $420.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $453.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $399.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $433.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $413.0M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $319.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $340.0M | $-30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $679.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $272.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $303.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $266.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $321.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $301.0M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $229.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $598.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | -36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.76× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.28× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.08× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.95× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.45× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.72× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FLEX
| Flex Reliability Solutions FRS | $3.2B | 46% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $2.7B | 38% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.1B | 16% |
NNDM
Segment breakdown not available.
