vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) and MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC. (MERC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($489.3M vs $475.2M, roughly 1.0× Fluence Energy, Inc.). On growth, Fluence Energy, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (154.4% vs -3.5%). Over the past eight quarters, MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.'s revenue compounded faster (-1.0% CAGR vs -12.7%).
Progress Energy was a power generation and distribution company. Prior to its merger with Duke Energy, it was a Fortune 500 energy company with more than 21,000 megawatts of generation capacity and $9 billion in annual revenues. Headquartered in Raleigh, North Carolina, Progress Energy includes two major electric utilities that serve approximately 3.1 million customers in the Carolinas and Florida. As an independent company, the last chairman and CEO of Progress Energy was William D. Johnson;...
Mercer is an American consulting firm founded in 1945. It is one of the four operating subsidiaries of global professional services firm Marsh McLennan. Mercer is headquartered in New York City with offices in 43 countries and operations in 130 countries. The company primarily provides human resources and financial services consulting services to its clients.
FLNC vs MERC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $475.2M | $489.3M |
| Net Profit | $-45.1M | — |
| Gross Margin | 4.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -14.8% | — |
| Net Margin | -9.5% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 154.4% | -3.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -8.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.34 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $489.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $475.2M | $449.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $458.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $602.5M | $453.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.6M | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.8M | $488.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $502.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $483.3M | $499.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-45.1M | $-308.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.9M | $-80.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $-86.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-31.0M | $-22.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-41.5M | $16.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.8M | $-17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $785.0K | $-67.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -14.8% | -62.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | -14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | -12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -31.4% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | -8.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -9.5% | -68.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.7% | -17.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | -19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.2% | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.2% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | -3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | -13.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.34 | $-4.61 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.18 | $-1.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $-1.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.24 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.32 | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.34 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | $-1.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $452.6M | $84.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $388.0M | — |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $84.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.6M | $186.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $690.8M | $98.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $436.3M | $146.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $568.6M | $181.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $607.4M | $184.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $448.7M | $239.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $388.2M | $263.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $388.0M | $68.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $429.6M | $359.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $407.4M | $446.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $388.2M | $437.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $409.4M | $429.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $472.1M | $516.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $421.2M | $487.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $2.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 23.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.22× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-226.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-232.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -48.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-179.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-226.8M | $46.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $265.7M | $-30.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-153.9M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.2M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-211.2M | $71.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.5M | $-13.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.1M | $62.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-232.6M | $32.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $260.9M | $-60.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-157.4M | $-28.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-50.5M | $-23.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-213.3M | $50.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3M | $-41.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-23.5M | $44.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -48.9% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.0% | -13.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -26.1% | -6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.7% | -4.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -114.2% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | -8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.9% | 8.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 3.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.81× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -24.61× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.87× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FLNC
| Products | $450.9M | 95% |
| Services | $22.5M | 5% |
| Digital Applications And Solutions | $1.9M | 0% |
MERC
| Pulp segment | $345.0M | 71% |
| Solid wood segment | $131.7M | 27% |
| Corporate and other | $12.6M | 3% |
