vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) and POWER SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. (PSIX), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fluence Energy, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($475.2M vs $191.2M, roughly 2.5× POWER SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC.). POWER SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. runs the higher net margin — -9.5% vs 8.4%, a 17.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fluence Energy, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (154.4% vs 32.5%). POWER SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-7.6M vs $-232.6M). Over the past eight quarters, POWER SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (41.7% CAGR vs -12.7%).
Progress Energy was a power generation and distribution company. Prior to its merger with Duke Energy, it was a Fortune 500 energy company with more than 21,000 megawatts of generation capacity and $9 billion in annual revenues. Headquartered in Raleigh, North Carolina, Progress Energy includes two major electric utilities that serve approximately 3.1 million customers in the Carolinas and Florida. As an independent company, the last chairman and CEO of Progress Energy was William D. Johnson;...
Adani Energy Solutions Ltd, formerly known as Adani Transmission Ltd, is an electric power transmission and distribution company headquartered in Ahmedabad. As of April 2025, the company operates a cumulative transmission network of 26,696 circuit kilometers and is one of the largest private sector power transmission companies operating in India.
FLNC vs PSIX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $475.2M | $191.2M |
| Net Profit | $-45.1M | $16.1M |
| Gross Margin | 4.9% | 21.9% |
| Operating Margin | -14.8% | 12.7% |
| Net Margin | -9.5% | 8.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 154.4% | 32.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -8.7% | -31.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.34 | $0.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $475.2M | $191.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $203.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $602.5M | $191.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.6M | $135.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.8M | $144.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $125.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $483.3M | $110.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $623.1M | $95.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-45.1M | $16.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.9M | $27.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $51.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-31.0M | $19.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-41.5M | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.8M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $785.0K | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.2M | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.7% | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.9% | 29.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.8% | 28.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.2% | 31.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.3% | 27.0% |
| Q4 25 | -14.8% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.2% | 18.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -31.4% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.3% | 11.2% |
| Q4 25 | -9.5% | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.7% | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.2% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.2% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.5% | 7.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.34 | $0.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.18 | $1.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $2.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.24 | $0.83 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.32 | $1.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.34 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | $0.94 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $0.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $452.6M | $41.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $96.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $388.0M | $178.6M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $424.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.54× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $452.6M | $41.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $690.8M | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $436.3M | $49.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $568.6M | $50.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $607.4M | $55.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $448.7M | $40.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $388.2M | $28.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $411.8M | $33.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $96.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $96.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $184.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $238.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $292.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $345.0K |
| Q4 25 | $388.0M | $178.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $429.6M | $162.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $407.4M | $135.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $388.2M | $84.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $409.4M | $65.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $472.1M | $42.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $421.2M | $24.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $413.1M | $3.2M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $424.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $458.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $437.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $372.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $328.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $339.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $307.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $286.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.11× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-226.8M | $-4.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-232.6M | $-7.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -48.9% | -4.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 1.2% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | -0.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-179.7M | $14.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $-226.8M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $265.7M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-153.9M | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.2M | $8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-211.2M | $32.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.5M | $12.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.1M | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $70.9M | $15.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-232.6M | $-7.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $260.9M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-157.4M | $14.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-50.5M | $5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-213.3M | $30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3M | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-23.5M | $822.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.9M | $14.8M |
| Q4 25 | -48.9% | -4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -26.1% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.7% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -114.2% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.2% | 15.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.29× | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.81× | 0.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | -24.61× | 0.33× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.22× | 0.73× | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.87× | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.20× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FLNC
| Products | $450.9M | 95% |
| Services | $22.5M | 5% |
| Digital Applications And Solutions | $1.9M | 0% |
PSIX
| Energy End Market | $153.4M | 80% |
| Industrial End Market | $33.3M | 17% |
| Transportation End Market | $4.6M | 2% |
