vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FLUOR CORP (FLR) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FLUOR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.7B vs $1.9B, roughly 2.0× Regions Financial Corporation). Regions Financial Corporation runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 4.5%, a 25.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Regions Financial Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.0% vs -8.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Regions Financial Corporation's revenue compounded faster (25.7% CAGR vs -6.9%).
Fluor Corporation is an American engineering and construction firm, headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a holding company that provides services through its subsidiaries in three main areas: oil and gas, industrial and infrastructure, government and power. It is the largest publicly traded engineering and construction company in the Fortune 500 rankings and is listed as 265th overall.
Regions Financial Corporation is an American bank holding company headquartered in the Regions Center in Birmingham, Alabama. The company provides retail and commercial banking, trust, stock brokerage, and mortgage services. Its banking subsidiary, Regions Bank, operates about 2,000 automated teller machines and 1,300 branches in 15 states in the Southern and Midwestern United States.
FLR vs RF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.7B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $165.0M | $559.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 4.5% | 29.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.0% | 5.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 166.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.08 | $0.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $3.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $165.0M | $559.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.6B | $534.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-697.0M | $569.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $563.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-241.0M | $490.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $534.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.0M | $490.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $169.0M | $501.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -13.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 55.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.7% | 56.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | 56.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | 52.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 53.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 49.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 52.7% |
| Q1 26 | 4.5% | 29.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | -37.7% | 41.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.7% | 45.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 61.8% | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.1% | 41.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.7% | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 40.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 42.2% |
| Q1 26 | $1.08 | $0.62 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-9.40 | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.30 | $0.61 | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.81 | $0.59 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.42 | $0.51 | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.68 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.31 | $0.49 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.97 | $0.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $6.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | — | $160.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.34× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $19.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $19.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9B | $18.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | $18.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9B | $17.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $18.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $17.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $160.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.2B | $158.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.5B | $159.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.8B | $159.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.4B | $159.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1B | $157.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1B | $157.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8B | $154.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FLR
| Urban Solutions | $2.4B | 67% |
| Energy Solutions | $703.0M | 19% |
| Mission Solutions | $523.0M | 14% |
RF
Segment breakdown not available.
