vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of 1 800 FLOWERS COM INC (FLWS) and UiPath, Inc. (PATH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

1 800 FLOWERS COM INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($702.2M vs $411.1M, roughly 1.7× UiPath, Inc.). UiPath, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 48.4% vs 10.0%, a 38.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UiPath, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs -9.5%). 1 800 FLOWERS COM INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($302.2M vs $25.1M). Over the past eight quarters, UiPath, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (0.7% CAGR vs -7.6%).

1 800 FLOWERS COM INC is a leading U.S. e-commerce and omnichannel retail company specializing in floral arrangements, gift baskets, gourmet food, personalized gifts and home decor. It serves individual and corporate clients across North America, catering to gifting occasions including holidays, birthdays, anniversaries and corporate events via its recognized brand portfolio.

UiPath Inc. is a global software company that develops artificial intelligence (AI) and agentic automation and orchestration software. The company's software enables the building and orchestration of AI agents to automate complex processes and workflows.

FLWS vs PATH — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FLWS
FLWS
1.7× larger
FLWS
$702.2M
$411.1M
PATH
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
PATH
PATH
+25.4% gap
PATH
15.9%
-9.5%
FLWS
Higher net margin
PATH
PATH
38.3% more per $
PATH
48.4%
10.0%
FLWS
More free cash flow
FLWS
FLWS
$277.1M more FCF
FLWS
$302.2M
$25.1M
PATH
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
PATH
PATH
Annualised
PATH
0.7%
-7.6%
FLWS

Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
FLWS
FLWS
PATH
PATH
Revenue
$702.2M
$411.1M
Net Profit
$70.6M
$198.8M
Gross Margin
42.1%
83.3%
Operating Margin
10.6%
3.2%
Net Margin
10.0%
48.4%
Revenue YoY
-9.5%
15.9%
Net Profit YoY
9.6%
1966.2%
EPS (diluted)
$1.10
$0.37

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FLWS
FLWS
PATH
PATH
Q4 25
$702.2M
$411.1M
Q3 25
$215.2M
$361.7M
Q2 25
$336.6M
$356.6M
Q1 25
$331.5M
$423.6M
Q4 24
$775.5M
$354.7M
Q3 24
$242.1M
$316.3M
Q2 24
$335.1M
Q1 24
$379.4M
$405.3M
Net Profit
FLWS
FLWS
PATH
PATH
Q4 25
$70.6M
$198.8M
Q3 25
$-53.0M
$1.6M
Q2 25
$-51.9M
$-22.6M
Q1 25
$-178.2M
$51.8M
Q4 24
$64.3M
$-10.7M
Q3 24
$-34.2M
$-86.1M
Q2 24
$-28.7M
Q1 24
$-16.9M
$33.9M
Gross Margin
FLWS
FLWS
PATH
PATH
Q4 25
42.1%
83.3%
Q3 25
35.7%
82.2%
Q2 25
35.5%
82.1%
Q1 25
31.7%
84.8%
Q4 24
43.3%
82.0%
Q3 24
38.1%
80.0%
Q2 24
83.5%
Q1 24
36.6%
86.8%
Operating Margin
FLWS
FLWS
PATH
PATH
Q4 25
10.6%
3.2%
Q3 25
-23.5%
-5.6%
Q2 25
-16.5%
-4.6%
Q1 25
-58.4%
7.9%
Q4 24
11.7%
-12.2%
Q3 24
-19.4%
-32.7%
Q2 24
-14.8%
Q1 24
-7.4%
3.7%
Net Margin
FLWS
FLWS
PATH
PATH
Q4 25
10.0%
48.4%
Q3 25
-24.6%
0.4%
Q2 25
-15.4%
-6.3%
Q1 25
-53.8%
12.2%
Q4 24
8.3%
-3.0%
Q3 24
-14.1%
-27.2%
Q2 24
-8.6%
Q1 24
-4.5%
8.4%
EPS (diluted)
FLWS
FLWS
PATH
PATH
Q4 25
$1.10
$0.37
Q3 25
$-0.83
$0.00
Q2 25
$-0.80
$-0.04
Q1 25
$-2.80
$0.09
Q4 24
$1.00
$-0.02
Q3 24
$-0.53
$-0.15
Q2 24
$-0.05
Q1 24
$-0.26
$0.07

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FLWS
FLWS
PATH
PATH
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$193.3M
$1.4B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$123.5M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$289.7M
$1.9B
Total Assets
$893.1M
$2.9B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.43×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FLWS
FLWS
PATH
PATH
Q4 25
$193.3M
$1.4B
Q3 25
$7.7M
$1.4B
Q2 25
$46.5M
$1.6B
Q1 25
$84.7M
$1.6B
Q4 24
$247.2M
$1.6B
Q3 24
$8.4M
$1.7B
Q2 24
$1.9B
Q1 24
$184.0M
$1.9B
Total Debt
FLWS
FLWS
PATH
PATH
Q4 25
$123.5M
Q3 25
$128.9M
Q2 25
$134.8M
Q1 25
$142.3M
Q4 24
$157.5M
Q3 24
$172.3M
Q2 24
Q1 24
$179.4M
Stockholders' Equity
FLWS
FLWS
PATH
PATH
Q4 25
$289.7M
$1.9B
Q3 25
$217.5M
$1.7B
Q2 25
$268.3M
$1.7B
Q1 25
$317.7M
$1.8B
Q4 24
$495.1M
$1.7B
Q3 24
$433.4M
$1.8B
Q2 24
$2.0B
Q1 24
$485.3M
$2.0B
Total Assets
FLWS
FLWS
PATH
PATH
Q4 25
$893.1M
$2.9B
Q3 25
$840.5M
$2.6B
Q2 25
$772.6M
$2.6B
Q1 25
$806.2M
$2.9B
Q4 24
$1.1B
$2.7B
Q3 24
$1.0B
$2.7B
Q2 24
$2.8B
Q1 24
$1.0B
$3.0B
Debt / Equity
FLWS
FLWS
PATH
PATH
Q4 25
0.43×
Q3 25
0.59×
Q2 25
0.50×
Q1 25
0.45×
Q4 24
0.32×
Q3 24
0.40×
Q2 24
Q1 24
0.37×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FLWS
FLWS
PATH
PATH
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$309.9M
$28.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$302.2M
$25.1M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
43.0%
6.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.1%
0.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
4.39×
0.14×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-39.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FLWS
FLWS
PATH
PATH
Q4 25
$309.9M
$28.3M
Q3 25
$-139.0M
$41.6M
Q2 25
$-27.1M
$119.0M
Q1 25
$-150.6M
$146.1M
Q4 24
$328.5M
$28.1M
Q3 24
$-177.2M
$46.4M
Q2 24
$100.0M
Q1 24
$-112.7M
$145.6M
Free Cash Flow
FLWS
FLWS
PATH
PATH
Q4 25
$302.2M
$25.1M
Q3 25
$-145.6M
Q2 25
$-36.1M
$106.2M
Q1 25
$-160.0M
$138.7M
Q4 24
$317.6M
$23.2M
Q3 24
$-189.3M
$45.0M
Q2 24
$98.8M
Q1 24
$-121.4M
$141.8M
FCF Margin
FLWS
FLWS
PATH
PATH
Q4 25
43.0%
6.1%
Q3 25
-67.7%
Q2 25
-10.7%
29.8%
Q1 25
-48.3%
32.7%
Q4 24
41.0%
6.5%
Q3 24
-78.2%
14.2%
Q2 24
29.5%
Q1 24
-32.0%
35.0%
Capex Intensity
FLWS
FLWS
PATH
PATH
Q4 25
1.1%
0.8%
Q3 25
3.1%
0.0%
Q2 25
2.7%
3.6%
Q1 25
2.8%
1.7%
Q4 24
1.4%
1.4%
Q3 24
5.0%
0.4%
Q2 24
0.4%
Q1 24
2.3%
0.9%
Cash Conversion
FLWS
FLWS
PATH
PATH
Q4 25
4.39×
0.14×
Q3 25
26.25×
Q2 25
Q1 25
2.82×
Q4 24
5.11×
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
4.29×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FLWS
FLWS

Gourmet Foods And Gift Baskets$499.0M71%
Ecommerce$179.5M26%
Bloom Net$22.1M3%
Other$1.7M0%

PATH
PATH

Subscription Services$247.6M60%
License$150.0M36%
Professional Services And Other$13.5M3%

Related Comparisons