vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BingEx Ltd (FLX) and FIRST MID BANCSHARES, INC. (FMBH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BingEx Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.2M vs $88.2M, roughly 1.6× FIRST MID BANCSHARES, INC.). FIRST MID BANCSHARES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 26.8% vs 2.2%, a 24.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
First Mid Bancshares Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered regional financial services holding company. It provides full-range retail and commercial banking products, wealth management, insurance solutions, and agricultural financing, mainly serving individual consumers, small and medium-sized enterprises, and agricultural clients across multiple Midwestern states including Illinois, Missouri, and Indiana.
FLX vs FMBH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.2M | $88.2M |
| Net Profit | $3.2M | $23.7M |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 34.0% |
| Net Margin | 2.2% | 26.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 3.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 23.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.98 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $143.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $88.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.2M | $89.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.0M | $87.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0M | $84.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $85.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.6M | $80.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $79.2M |
| Q1 26 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $23.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | $22.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $23.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.6M | $22.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | $19.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $19.7M |
| Q1 26 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 34.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 34.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.7% |
| Q1 26 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 26.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 26.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.6% | 26.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 24.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.98 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.94 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.98 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.93 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.81 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.82 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $561.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $354.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $958.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $8.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.37× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $561.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $628.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $499.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $592.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $517.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $354.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $958.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $932.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $894.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $870.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $846.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $858.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $813.6M |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $7.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $7.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $7.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $926.8M | $7.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $130.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $124.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 140.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 7.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 5.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $207.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $130.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $33.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $47.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $124.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $24.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $124.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $31.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $46.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $119.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $32.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $22.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 140.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 54.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 140.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 39.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.49× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.21× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
