vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BingEx Ltd (FLX) and GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD (GILT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($152.7M vs $143.2M, roughly 1.1× BingEx Ltd). GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD runs the higher net margin — 4.1% vs 2.2%, a 1.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. is an Israeli public company. It provides satellite-based broadband communications technology, its main expertise being the development, manufacture, and marketing of ground-based satellite systems for global communication via satellites.
FLX vs GILT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.2M | $152.7M |
| Net Profit | $3.2M | $6.3M |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | 35.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.4% |
| Net Margin | 2.2% | 4.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $57016808.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $143.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.0M | $152.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $126.6M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $106.9M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $98.2M |
| Q1 26 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-5.2M |
| Q1 26 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | 35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.7% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 29.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -4.0% |
| Q1 26 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -5.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $57016808.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $56622204.00 | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $561.1M | $64.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $56.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $315.8M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $575.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $561.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $628.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $499.4M | $64.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $592.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $517.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $93.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $87.4M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $70.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $56.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $315.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $282.8M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $255.0M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $245.7M |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $575.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $926.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $416.9M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $371.6M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $376.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
