vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BingEx Ltd (FLX) and HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. (HIVE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BingEx Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.2M vs $93.1M, roughly 1.5× HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd.). BingEx Ltd runs the higher net margin — 2.2% vs -98.1%, a 100.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Mastech Digital, Inc. is a digital transformation and information technology (IT) services company headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, providing services to corporations across North America, Middle East, Asian, and Japan.
FLX vs HIVE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.2M | $93.1M |
| Net Profit | $3.2M | $-91.3M |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | -27.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 2.2% | -98.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 218.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -234.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $143.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $93.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.2M | $87.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.0M | $45.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $29.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.6M | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $32.2M |
| Q1 26 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-91.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | $-15.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | $80.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-18.3M |
| Q1 26 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | -13.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -43.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | -66.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -7.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -98.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | -18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 76.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 233.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -56.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.38 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.52 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $561.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $559.3M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $624.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $561.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $628.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $499.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $592.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $40.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $517.4M | $31.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $559.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $624.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $560.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $430.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $275.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $268.6M |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $624.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $693.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $628.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $478.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $926.8M | $334.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $46.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-10.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-28.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-55.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-34.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -189.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -153.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 92.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 143.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.42× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -26.94× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
