vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BingEx Ltd (FLX) and Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd (LANV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($144.1M vs $143.2M, roughly 1.0× BingEx Ltd).
Lanvin is a French luxury fashion house founded in 1889 by Jeanne Lanvin in Paris. It is the oldest French fashion house still in operation. Since 2018, it has been a subsidiary of Shanghai-based Lanvin Group. Lanvin Group includes Lanvin, Sergio Rossi, Wolford, St. John Knits, and Caruso.
FLX vs LANV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.2M | $144.1M |
| Net Profit | $3.2M | — |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | 53.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -60.5% |
| Net Margin | 2.2% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $143.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.0M | $144.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $184.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $231.7M |
| Q1 26 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | 53.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 57.5% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 58.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | -60.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -35.0% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -32.5% |
| Q1 26 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $561.1M | $32.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $290.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $-116.4M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $632.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $561.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $628.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $499.4M | $32.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $592.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $517.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $19.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $290.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $136.4M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-116.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $100.1M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $632.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $926.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $731.8M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-75.1K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-75.1K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-36.2K | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-62.8K |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
