vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BingEx Ltd (FLX) and PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BingEx Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.2M vs $93.6M, roughly 1.5× PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust). PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust runs the higher net margin — 56.0% vs 2.2%, a 53.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust is a U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust specializing in residential mortgage assets. It invests in performing and non-performing mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities, and credit risk transfer instruments, operating across investment management and mortgage servicing segments in the U.S. housing market.
FLX vs PMT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.2M | $93.6M |
| Net Profit | $3.2M | $52.4M |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 38.6% |
| Net Margin | 2.2% | 56.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -13.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 12.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.49 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $143.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $93.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.2M | $99.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.0M | $70.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0M | $44.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $107.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.6M | $80.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $71.2M |
| Q1 26 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $52.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | $58.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.6M | $9.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $46.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | $41.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $25.4M |
| Q1 26 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 47.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 24.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 51.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 32.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.2% |
| Q1 26 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 56.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 58.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.6% | 21.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 51.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.49 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.45 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $561.1M | $190.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $21.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.58× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $561.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $190.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $628.6M | $181.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $499.4M | $108.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $592.4M | $204.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $103.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $517.4M | $102.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $336.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $299.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $968.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $21.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $14.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $926.8M | $13.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.76× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-7.2B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -137.76× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-594.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-983.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $243.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -137.76× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -22.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -267.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -61.39× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -58.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -23.76× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.59× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FLX
Segment breakdown not available.
PMT
| Other | $55.0M | 59% |
| Interest Rate Sensitive Strategies | $31.4M | 34% |
| Correspondent Production | $7.2M | 8% |
