vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BingEx Ltd (FLX) and Turtle Beach Corp (TBCH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BingEx Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.2M vs $95.1M, roughly 1.5× Turtle Beach Corp). Turtle Beach Corp runs the higher net margin — 18.5% vs 2.2%, a 16.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
The Turtle Beach Corporation is an American gaming accessory manufacturer based in San Diego, California. The company has roots dating back to the 1970s where it developed sound cards, MIDI synthesizers, and various audio software packages and network audio devices. The company began making gaming headsets in 2005.
FLX vs TBCH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.2M | $95.1M |
| Net Profit | $3.2M | $17.6M |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | 50.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 22.0% |
| Net Margin | 2.2% | 18.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -34.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -12.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.86 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $143.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $95.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.2M | $80.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.0M | $80.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0M | $63.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $146.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.6M | $94.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $76.5M |
| Q1 26 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.6M | $-664.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-7.5M |
| Q1 26 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 50.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | 22.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 36.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 37.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | 36.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | -0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -5.4% |
| Q1 26 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 18.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.6% | -1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -9.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.86 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $561.1M | $17.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $55.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $128.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $269.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.43× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $561.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $17.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $628.6M | $12.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $499.4M | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $592.4M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $517.4M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $55.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $57.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $43.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $48.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $49.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $49.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $49.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $128.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $110.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $116.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $120.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $120.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $101.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $105.3M |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $269.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $278.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $240.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $247.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $298.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $926.8M | $313.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $264.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.47× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $13.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $13.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 13.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.76× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $34.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-15.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $40.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-23.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-12.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $13.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-15.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $40.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-24.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-13.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -19.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 63.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -26.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -18.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.76× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -8.84× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -6.79× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FLX
Segment breakdown not available.
TBCH
| Europe And Middle East | $71.0M | 75% |
| Asia Pacific | $13.3M | 14% |
| Other | $10.8M | 11% |
