vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BingEx Ltd (FLX) and UP Fintech Holding Ltd (TIGR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BingEx Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.2M vs $107.6M, roughly 1.3× UP Fintech Holding Ltd). UP Fintech Holding Ltd runs the higher net margin — 28.4% vs 2.2%, a 26.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
UP Fintech Holding Limited, operating under the Tiger Brokers brand, provides online financial services for global Chinese investors. It offers cross-market stock trading (US, Hong Kong, mainland China A-shares), fund management, margin financing and investor education for retail and institutional clients.
FLX vs TIGR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.2M | $107.6M |
| Net Profit | $3.2M | $30.6M |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 2.2% | 28.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $143.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0M | $107.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $166.4M |
| Q1 26 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.6M | $30.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $15.2M |
| Q1 26 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.0% |
| Q1 26 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.6% | 28.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $561.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | — |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $561.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $628.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $499.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $592.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $517.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $392.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $501.2M |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $926.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.8B |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.