vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BingEx Ltd (FLX) and Via Renewables, Inc. (VIASP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BingEx Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.2M vs $127.8M, roughly 1.1× Via Renewables, Inc.). Via Renewables, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.4% vs 2.2%, a 3.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
EDF Power Solutions is a wholly owned subsidiary of the French utility EDF Group, specializing in renewable energy production. As an integrated operator, the Group develops and finances the construction of renewable energy facilities, and manages operations and maintenance for its own account and for third parties.
FLX vs VIASP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.2M | $127.8M |
| Net Profit | $3.2M | $6.9M |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | 34.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 15.2% |
| Net Margin | 2.2% | 5.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 22.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -30.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $143.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $127.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.2M | $103.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.0M | $90.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0M | $142.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $104.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.6M | $93.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $86.7M |
| Q1 26 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | $757.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.6M | $8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.6M |
| Q1 26 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 34.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | 23.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | 30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 32.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 51.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 50.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.8% |
| Q1 26 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.6% | 6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.41 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.83 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $561.1M | $41.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $120.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $67.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $331.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.77× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $561.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $41.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $628.6M | $53.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $499.4M | $62.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $592.4M | $64.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $53.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $517.4M | $66.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $53.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $120.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $105.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $100.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $101.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $106.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $89.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $93.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $67.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $63.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $68.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $72.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $66.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $58.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $58.3M |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $331.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $304.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $316.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $347.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $344.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $926.8M | $298.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $299.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.39× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.60× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-4.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-4.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -3.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.61× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $39.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $19.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $24.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $18.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $23.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -0.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.94× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.84× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.47× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FLX
Segment breakdown not available.
VIASP
| Retail Electricity | $79.7M | 62% |
| Retail Natural Gas | $48.9M | 38% |
