vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BingEx Ltd (FLX) and VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. (VRTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($208.0M vs $143.2M, roughly 1.5× BingEx Ltd). VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 16.3% vs 2.2%, a 14.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC.VRTSEarnings & Financial Report
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. is an American company which operates as a multi-manager asset management business, comprising a number of individual affiliated managers, each having its own investment process and brand, and the services of unaffiliated sub advisers.
FLX vs VRTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.2M | $208.0M |
| Net Profit | $3.2M | $33.9M |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 19.1% |
| Net Margin | 2.2% | 16.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -10.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -14.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $5.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $143.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $208.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.2M | $216.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.0M | $210.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0M | $217.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $233.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.6M | $227.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $224.4M |
| Q1 26 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $33.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | $31.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $42.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.6M | $28.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $39.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $26.0M |
| Q1 26 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.7% |
| Q1 26 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 16.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.6% | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 21.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.71 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.43 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $561.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $390.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $934.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $4.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $561.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $628.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $499.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $592.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $517.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $390.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $231.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $231.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $232.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $237.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $247.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $934.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $918.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $896.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $893.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $897.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $889.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $868.7M |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $926.8M | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.29× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-67.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-74.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -35.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -1.99× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $100.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-67.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $108.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $75.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $70.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-74.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $106.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $74.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $68.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $68.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -35.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -1.99× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.69× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FLX
Segment breakdown not available.
VRTS
| Open End Funds | $68.9M | 33% |
| Retail Separate Accounts | $51.3M | 25% |
| Institutional Accounts | $39.6M | 19% |
| Administration And Shareholder Service Fees | $18.4M | 9% |
| Closed End Funds | $15.9M | 8% |
| Distribution And Service Fees | $12.3M | 6% |
