vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FIRST MID BANCSHARES, INC. (FMBH) and SILICOM LTD. (SILC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FIRST MID BANCSHARES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($88.2M vs $61.9M, roughly 1.4× SILICOM LTD.). FIRST MID BANCSHARES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 26.8% vs -18.5%, a 45.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SILICOM LTD. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs 3.4%). FIRST MID BANCSHARES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($124.0M vs $-3.3M).
First Mid Bancshares Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered regional financial services holding company. It provides full-range retail and commercial banking products, wealth management, insurance solutions, and agricultural financing, mainly serving individual consumers, small and medium-sized enterprises, and agricultural clients across multiple Midwestern states including Illinois, Missouri, and Indiana.
Silicom Ltd. is a publicly traded company, headquartered in Israel, that specializes in the design, manufacture and marketing of connectivity solutions for a range of servers and server-based systems. Its shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Market and on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. Silicom is a member of the RAD Group family of companies.
FMBH vs SILC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $88.2M | $61.9M |
| Net Profit | $23.7M | $-11.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 34.0% | -19.8% |
| Net Margin | 26.8% | -18.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.4% | 6.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 23.5% | 16.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.98 | $-2.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $88.2M | $61.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.3M | $58.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $79.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $23.7M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.2M | $-13.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 34.0% | -19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.7% | -22.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | -18.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.5% | -23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.98 | $-2.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.94 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.98 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.81 | $-2.28 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.81 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.82 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.86 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $42.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $354.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $958.7M | $117.5M |
| Total Assets | $8.0B | $152.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.37× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $72.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $354.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $958.7M | $117.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $932.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $894.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $870.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $846.4M | $127.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $858.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $813.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $798.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.0B | $152.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $150.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $130.9M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $124.0M | $-3.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 140.6% | -5.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.8% | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.53× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $207.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $130.9M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $124.4M | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $124.0M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $119.5M | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 140.6% | -5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 54.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 140.0% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.53× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.16× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.49× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.70× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.21× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.42× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
