vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FIRST MID BANCSHARES, INC. (FMBH) and UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS INC (USLM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FIRST MID BANCSHARES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($88.2M vs $87.9M, roughly 1.0× UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS INC). UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS INC runs the higher net margin — 34.7% vs 26.8%, a 7.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.8% vs 3.4%). FIRST MID BANCSHARES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($124.0M vs $25.7M). Over the past eight quarters, UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS INC's revenue compounded faster (10.8% CAGR vs 5.0%).
First Mid Bancshares Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered regional financial services holding company. It provides full-range retail and commercial banking products, wealth management, insurance solutions, and agricultural financing, mainly serving individual consumers, small and medium-sized enterprises, and agricultural clients across multiple Midwestern states including Illinois, Missouri, and Indiana.
United States Lime & Minerals Inc is a leading US-based natural resources enterprise that produces high-calcium lime, dolomitic lime, limestone and related mineral products. Its core client segments cover infrastructure construction, steel manufacturing, agricultural soil amendment, environmental emission control and industrial processing, serving customers across North America.
FMBH vs USLM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $88.2M | $87.9M |
| Net Profit | $23.7M | $30.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 48.0% |
| Operating Margin | 34.0% | 41.0% |
| Net Margin | 26.8% | 34.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.4% | 9.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 23.5% | 13.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.98 | $1.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $88.2M | $87.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.3M | $102.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.5M | $91.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.3M | $91.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.3M | $80.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.6M | $89.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.2M | $76.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $79.9M | $71.7M |
| Q4 25 | $23.7M | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.5M | $38.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.4M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.2M | $34.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.2M | $27.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.5M | $33.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.7M | $26.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.5M | $22.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 48.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 51.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 48.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 42.7% |
| Q4 25 | 34.0% | 41.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.2% | 45.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.4% | 39.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | 43.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.7% | 38.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.5% | 42.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.7% | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.7% | 35.9% |
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | 34.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.2% | 38.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.8% | 33.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.3% | 37.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.5% | 33.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.2% | 37.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.9% | 34.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.6% | 31.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.98 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.94 | $1.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.98 | $1.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.93 | $1.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.81 | $-2.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.81 | $1.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.82 | $0.91 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.86 | $3.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $371.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $354.5M | $0 |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $958.7M | $630.8M |
| Total Assets | $8.0B | $681.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.37× | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $371.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $349.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $319.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $300.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $278.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $255.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $222.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $207.0M |
| Q4 25 | $354.5M | $0 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0 |
| Q4 25 | $958.7M | $630.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $932.2M | $602.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $894.1M | $563.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $870.9M | $532.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $846.4M | $497.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $858.5M | $474.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $813.6M | $441.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $798.0M | $415.3M |
| Q4 25 | $8.0B | $681.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8B | $652.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.7B | $607.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.6B | $585.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $543.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.6B | $521.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6B | $484.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.7B | $464.0M |
| Q4 25 | 0.37× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $130.9M | $45.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $124.0M | $25.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 140.6% | 29.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.8% | 22.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.53× | 1.49× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $207.9M | $102.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $130.9M | $45.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.0M | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.7M | $34.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.9M | $39.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $124.4M | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.1M | $39.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.0M | $21.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.0M | $27.2M |
| Q4 25 | $124.0M | $25.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.9M | $31.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $20.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.0M | $24.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $119.5M | $27.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.0M | $33.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.9M | $16.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.6M | $20.3M |
| Q4 25 | 140.6% | 29.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.8% | 30.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 22.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 54.5% | 26.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 140.0% | 34.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.7% | 37.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.9% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.5% | 28.4% |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 14.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | 16.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | 5.53× | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.47× | 1.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.33× | 1.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.16× | 1.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.49× | 1.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.70× | 1.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.21× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.42× | 1.21× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
