vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) and Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Fresenius Medical Care AG is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.5B vs $4.0B, roughly 1.4× Viking Holdings Ltd). Viking Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — 12.9% vs 7.9%, a 5.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.

Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA is a German healthcare company which provides kidney dialysis services through a network of 4,171 outpatient dialysis centers, serving 345,425 patients. The company primarily treats end-stage renal disease (ESRD), which requires patients to undergo dialysis 3 times per week for the rest of their lives.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings (NCLH) is a holding company that is based in the United States and domiciled in Bermuda. It operates three cruise lines as wholly owned subsidiaries: Norwegian Cruise Line, Oceania Cruises, and Regent Seven Seas Cruises. With its subsidiaries combined, it is the third-largest cruise operator in the world. It is a publicly traded company listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

FMS vs VIK — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FMS
FMS
1.4× larger
FMS
$5.5B
$4.0B
VIK
Higher net margin
VIK
VIK
5.0% more per $
VIK
12.9%
7.9%
FMS

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025

Metric
FMS
FMS
VIK
VIK
Revenue
$5.5B
$4.0B
Net Profit
$434.2M
$514.0M
Gross Margin
27.4%
73.4%
Operating Margin
11.7%
15.2%
Net Margin
7.9%
12.9%
Revenue YoY
-0.3%
Net Profit YoY
240.4%
35.4%
EPS (diluted)
$1.15

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FMS
FMS
VIK
VIK
Q4 25
$5.5B
Q3 25
$4.0B
Q2 25
$2.3B
Q1 25
$718.2M
Q4 24
$5.5B
Q3 24
$3.6B
Q2 24
$2.1B
Net Profit
FMS
FMS
VIK
VIK
Q4 25
$434.2M
Q3 25
$514.0M
Q2 25
$439.2M
Q1 25
$-105.5M
Q4 24
$127.6M
Q3 24
$379.7M
Q2 24
$159.8M
Gross Margin
FMS
FMS
VIK
VIK
Q4 25
27.4%
Q3 25
73.4%
Q2 25
55.7%
Q1 25
17.3%
Q4 24
25.0%
Q3 24
74.7%
Q2 24
57.8%
Operating Margin
FMS
FMS
VIK
VIK
Q4 25
11.7%
Q3 25
15.2%
Q2 25
23.7%
Q1 25
-1.3%
Q4 24
5.1%
Q3 24
13.6%
Q2 24
20.5%
Net Margin
FMS
FMS
VIK
VIK
Q4 25
7.9%
Q3 25
12.9%
Q2 25
19.1%
Q1 25
-14.7%
Q4 24
2.3%
Q3 24
10.6%
Q2 24
7.7%
EPS (diluted)
FMS
FMS
VIK
VIK
Q4 25
Q3 25
$1.15
Q2 25
$0.99
Q1 25
$-0.24
Q4 24
Q3 24
$0.87
Q2 24
$0.38

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FMS
FMS
VIK
VIK
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.7B
$3.0B
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$15.4B
$803.5M
Total Assets
$33.5B
$11.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FMS
FMS
VIK
VIK
Q4 25
$1.7B
Q3 25
$3.0B
Q2 25
$2.6B
Q1 25
$2.8B
Q4 24
$1.3B
Q3 24
$2.4B
Q2 24
$1.8B
Stockholders' Equity
FMS
FMS
VIK
VIK
Q4 25
$15.4B
Q3 25
$803.5M
Q2 25
$278.3M
Q1 25
$-267.5M
Q4 24
$17.0B
Q3 24
$-688.9M
Q2 24
$-1.1B
Total Assets
FMS
FMS
VIK
VIK
Q4 25
$33.5B
Q3 25
$11.5B
Q2 25
$11.1B
Q1 25
$10.7B
Q4 24
$36.3B
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FMS
FMS
VIK
VIK
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$2.9B
$663.9M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
6.67×
1.29×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FMS
FMS
VIK
VIK
Q4 25
$2.9B
Q3 25
$663.9M
Q2 25
$470.7M
Q1 25
$587.9M
Q4 24
$2.6B
Q3 24
$828.7M
Q2 24
$419.8M
Cash Conversion
FMS
FMS
VIK
VIK
Q4 25
6.67×
Q3 25
1.29×
Q2 25
1.07×
Q1 25
Q4 24
20.20×
Q3 24
2.18×
Q2 24
2.63×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons