vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF) and CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CHART INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $544.0M, roughly 2.0× Fidelity National Financial, Inc.). CHART INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs -21.5%, a 26.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fidelity National Financial, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.3% vs -2.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Fidelity National Financial, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs 6.6%).
Fidelity National Financial, Inc., is an American provider of title insurance and settlement services to the real estate and mortgage industries. A Fortune 500 company, Fidelity National Financial generated approximately $8.469 billion in annual revenue in 2019 from its title and real estate-related operations. The company was the first instance of an attorney licensed by a Native American Tribe being certified as "authorized house counsel" in the state of Florida.
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
FNF vs GTLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $544.0M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $-117.0M | $53.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | 82.9% | 11.6% |
| Net Margin | -21.5% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.3% | -2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -126.0% | -32.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.44 | $1.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $544.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $553.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $547.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $455.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $493.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $504.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $421.0M | $950.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-117.0M | $53.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $358.0M | $-138.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $278.0M | $76.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.0M | $49.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $450.0M | $79.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $266.0M | $69.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $306.0M | $58.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $248.0M | $11.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.8% |
| Q4 25 | 82.9% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 81.9% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.8% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.4% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.9% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 90.9% | 16.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 78.6% | 11.9% |
| Q4 25 | -21.5% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 64.7% | -12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.8% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.2% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 91.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.6% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.7% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 58.9% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.44 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.33 | $-3.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.02 | $1.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.65 | $1.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $1.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.12 | $1.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.91 | $0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.6B | $366.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.4B | $3.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.4B | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $109.0B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.59× | 1.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $366.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | $399.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $342.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $296.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $308.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $310.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $247.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $191.9M |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.9B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | $109.0B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.6B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.3B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.2B | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $95.4B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $94.7B | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.8B | $9.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $84.5B | $9.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.59× | 1.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.56× | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.55× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.5B | $88.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $66.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $202.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $88.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $118.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $145.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $-60.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $200.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $116.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $-95.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $66.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $122.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-80.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $174.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $88.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-141.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.66× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.82× | 1.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.43× | -1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.32× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.89× | 2.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.45× | 1.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.42× | -8.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FNF
| Escrow Fees | $241.0M | 44% |
| Other Title Related Fees And Income | $182.0M | 33% |
| Service Link Excluding Title Premiums Escrow Fees And Subservicing Fees | $87.0M | 16% |
| Insurance Contracts Home Warranty | $31.0M | 6% |
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
