vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF) and Enpro Inc. (NPO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fidelity National Financial, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($544.0M vs $295.4M, roughly 1.8× Enpro Inc.). Enpro Inc. runs the higher net margin — -10.8% vs -21.5%, a 10.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Enpro Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.3% vs 10.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Fidelity National Financial, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs 7.1%).
Fidelity National Financial, Inc., is an American provider of title insurance and settlement services to the real estate and mortgage industries. A Fortune 500 company, Fidelity National Financial generated approximately $8.469 billion in annual revenue in 2019 from its title and real estate-related operations. The company was the first instance of an attorney licensed by a Native American Tribe being certified as "authorized house counsel" in the state of Florida.
Enpro is a US-based industrial technology company that designs and manufactures products and materials for technology-intensive sectors. The company serves industries such as semiconductors, aerospace, power generation, heavy-duty trucking, agricultural machinery, chemical processing, pulp and paper, and life sciences from 61 primary manufacturing facilities located in 12 countries, worldwide. It is organized under three segments: Sealing Technologies, Advanced Surface Technologies, and Engin...
FNF vs NPO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $544.0M | $295.4M |
| Net Profit | $-117.0M | $-32.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 42.1% |
| Operating Margin | 82.9% | 11.2% |
| Net Margin | -21.5% | -10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.3% | 14.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -126.0% | -330.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.44 | $-1.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $544.0M | $295.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $553.0M | $286.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $547.0M | $288.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $455.0M | $273.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $493.0M | $258.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.0M | $260.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $504.0M | $271.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $421.0M | $257.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-117.0M | $-32.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $358.0M | $21.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $278.0M | $26.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.0M | $24.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $450.0M | $13.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $266.0M | $19.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $306.0M | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $248.0M | $12.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 42.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 42.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 41.2% |
| Q4 25 | 82.9% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 81.9% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.8% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.4% | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.9% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 90.9% | 17.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 78.6% | 10.9% |
| Q4 25 | -21.5% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 64.7% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.8% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.2% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 91.3% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.6% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.7% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 58.9% | 4.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.44 | $-1.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.33 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.02 | $1.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $1.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.65 | $0.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $0.94 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.12 | $1.27 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.91 | $0.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.6B | $114.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.4B | $655.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.4B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $109.0B | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.59× | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $114.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | $132.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $107.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $240.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $236.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $206.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $175.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $163.9M |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $655.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $640.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9B | $644.9M |
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $109.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $95.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $94.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.8B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $84.5B | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | 0.59× | 0.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.56× | 0.45× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.55× | 0.46× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.5B | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $65.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $52.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $21.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $59.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $54.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $43.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $6.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $53.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $42.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $49.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $48.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $38.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.66× | 3.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.82× | 1.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.43× | 0.86× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.32× | 4.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.89× | 2.73× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.45× | 1.62× | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.42× | 0.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FNF
| Escrow Fees | $241.0M | 44% |
| Other Title Related Fees And Income | $182.0M | 33% |
| Service Link Excluding Title Premiums Escrow Fees And Subservicing Fees | $87.0M | 16% |
| Insurance Contracts Home Warranty | $31.0M | 6% |
NPO
| Sealing Technologies Segment | $187.0M | 63% |
| General Industrial | $71.3M | 24% |
| Power Generation | $19.9M | 7% |
| Oiland Gas Market | $15.0M | 5% |
| Semiconductors | $2.2M | 1% |