vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Funko, Inc. (FNKO) and Ideal Power Inc. (IPWR), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Funko, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($19.2M vs $-2.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Funko, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.5% CAGR vs -100.0%).
Funko Inc. is an American company that manufactures licensed and limited pop culture collectibles, known for its licensed vinyl figurines and bobbleheads. In addition, the company produces licensed plush, action figures, apparel, accessories and games. Founded in 1998 by Mike Becker and Claudia Becker, Funko was originally conceived as a small project to create various low-tech, nostalgia-themed toys. The company's first manufactured bobblehead was of the Big Boy restaurant mascot.
Ideal Toy Company was an American toy company founded by Morris Michtom and his wife, Rose. During the post–World War II baby boom era, Ideal became the largest doll-making company in the United States. Their most popular dolls included Betsy Wetsy, Toni, Saucy Walker, Shirley Temple, Miss Revlon, Patti Playpal, Tammy, Thumbelina, Tiny Thumbelina, and Crissy. The company is also known for selling the Rubik's Cube.
FNKO vs IPWR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $273.1M | $0 |
| Net Profit | $-183.0K | $-1.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.2% | — |
| Net Margin | -0.1% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 87.8% | 26.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $273.1M | $0 | ||
| Q3 25 | $250.9M | $24.4K | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.5M | $1.3K | ||
| Q1 25 | $190.7M | $12.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $293.7M | $5.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $292.8M | $554 | ||
| Q2 24 | $247.7M | $1.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | $215.7M | $78.7K |
| Q4 25 | $-183.0K | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $901.0K | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-40.5M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-27.6M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.5M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.1M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-22.7M | $-2.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -172.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -157.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.9% | -172.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.0% | -1212.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.0% | 13.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | -12353.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.0% | -246313.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.2% | -23534.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | -51009.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | -523399.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | -216830.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.9% | -3209.3% |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | -12027.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.9% | -238177.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.5% | -22519.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.5% | -47998.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | -485622.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | -200004.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.5% | -3136.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.74 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.52 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.45 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $42.1M | $6.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $100.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $185.8M | $7.9M |
| Total Assets | $685.2M | $10.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.54× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $42.1M | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.2M | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.2M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.9M | $13.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.7M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.5M | $18.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.6M | $20.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.1M | $20.2M |
| Q4 25 | $100.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $122.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $128.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $139.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $185.8M | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.7M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $181.2M | $12.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $212.8M | $15.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $233.0M | $17.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $236.5M | $20.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $223.5M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $212.5M | $21.7M |
| Q4 25 | $685.2M | $10.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $699.3M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $694.9M | $14.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $648.4M | $17.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $707.3M | $19.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $783.6M | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $737.8M | $23.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $725.5M | $23.9M |
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.66× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $28.1M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $19.2M | $-2.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 3.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-38.1M | $-9.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $28.1M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.2M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-22.2M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.3M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.8M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.9M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.5M | $-1.9M |
| Q4 25 | $19.2M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-31.8M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-28.8M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.8M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.2M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.8M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.3M | $-1.9M |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | -10708.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.5% | -187320.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.1% | -17313.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.3% | -47220.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | -424404.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.9% | -160034.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | -2419.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 287.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 2337.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 94.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | 70.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 23361.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 2586.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | 37.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.47× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.77× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.97× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FNKO
| Core Collectibles | $221.0M | 81% |
| Loungefly LLC | $43.1M | 16% |
| Other Products Excluding Core Collectibles And Loungefly Brands | $9.0M | 3% |
IPWR
Segment breakdown not available.
