vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of First Northwest Bancorp (FNWB) and SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC. (SMBC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($42.9M vs $14.7M, roughly 2.9× First Northwest Bancorp). SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC. runs the higher net margin — 42.3% vs 2.6%, a 39.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.4% vs 3.9%). Over the past eight quarters, SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (11.5% CAGR vs 2.7%).
First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. was headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, just east of O'Hare Airport. The company's predecessor traces back to Joliet, Illinois. From there the company has grown to serve many Chicago suburbs including northwest Indiana, downstate Illinois, southeast Wisconsin and the Quad Cities area including Iowa. First Midwest Bank is one of the largest banking institutions in the United States
U.S. Bancorp is an American multinational banking institution headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota and incorporated in Delaware. It is the 5th-largest bank in the United States as of 2025. As the largest bank in the Midwestern United States, it is considered systemically important by the Financial Stability Board. It is the parent company of its primary operating entity, U.S. Bank National Association, which does business as U.S. Bank. The company provides banking, investment, mortgage, tr...
FNWB vs SMBC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q2 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.7M | $42.9M |
| Net Profit | $382.0K | $18.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 6.2% | 52.9% |
| Net Margin | 2.6% | 42.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.9% | 12.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 113.6% | 23.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | $1.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $14.7M | $42.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.6M | $42.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.2M | $40.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.8M | $39.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.1M | $38.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.0M | $36.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.2M | $35.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.9M | $34.5M |
| Q4 25 | $382.0K | $18.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $802.0K | $15.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | $15.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.0M | $15.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.8M | $14.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $12.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.2M | $13.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $396.0K | $11.3M |
| Q4 25 | 6.2% | 52.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.0% | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.9% | 47.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -73.4% | 50.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.3% | 50.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.7% | 43.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -19.4% | 48.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 41.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 42.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.5% | 36.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.8% | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -65.3% | 39.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -19.9% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.1% | 34.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -15.6% | 38.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | 32.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.04 | $1.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | $1.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.42 | $1.39 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.03 | $1.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.31 | $1.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.23 | $1.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.25 | $1.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.04 | $0.99 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $134.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $157.3M | $567.4M |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $134.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $124.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $192.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $226.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $145.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $75.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $60.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $168.3M |
| Q4 25 | $157.3M | $567.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.5M | $560.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $149.7M | $544.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.5M | $528.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $153.9M | $512.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $160.8M | $505.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $158.9M | $488.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $160.5M | $479.6M |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $4.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $10.3M | $21.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $20.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 47.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 26.94× | 1.17× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $84.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.3M | $21.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0M | $27.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.7M | $24.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.5M | $20.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2M | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1M | $15.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.9M | $23.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $20.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $15.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $25.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $22.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.0M | $19.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 47.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 64.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 57.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 47.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 37.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.7% | 56.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 12.5% |
| Q4 25 | 26.94× | 1.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.89× | 1.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.08× | 1.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.54× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.80× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | -12.29× | 2.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
