vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. (FOLD) and Global Net Lease, Inc. (GNL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($185.2M vs $117.0M, roughly 1.6× Global Net Lease, Inc.). Global Net Lease, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 41.2% vs 0.9%, a 40.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.7% vs -15.1%). Over the past eight quarters, AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (29.5% CAGR vs -11.1%).
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. is a public American biopharmaceutical company based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The company went public in 2007 under the Nasdaq trading symbol FOLD. This followed a 2006 planned offering and subsequent withdrawal, which would have established the trading symbol as AMTX Prior to their IPO, Amicus was funded by a variety of venture capital firms including Radius Ventures, Canaan Partners and New Enterprise Associates.
Global Net Lease, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that acquires, owns and manages a diversified portfolio of commercial real estate assets under long-term net lease contracts. Its property portfolio spans North America and Europe, covering industrial, office, retail and other key sectors, serving tenants across multiple industries to deliver consistent long-term returns for shareholders.
FOLD vs GNL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $185.2M | $117.0M |
| Net Profit | $1.7M | $48.2M |
| Gross Margin | 85.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | 94.7% |
| Net Margin | 0.9% | 41.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.7% | -15.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.5% | 838.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $185.2M | $117.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.1M | $121.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $154.7M | $124.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $125.2M | $132.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $149.7M | $137.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.5M | $138.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.7M | $145.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.4M | $147.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $48.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.3M | $-60.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.4M | $-24.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.7M | $-189.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.7M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.7M | $-65.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.7M | $-35.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-48.4M | $-23.8M |
| Q4 25 | 85.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 88.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 90.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 91.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 87.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | 94.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.3% | -11.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.1% | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.3% | -21.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 40.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.8% | 42.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -25.1% | 38.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 41.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | -49.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.8% | -19.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.3% | -143.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.8% | -4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.8% | -47.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.4% | -24.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -43.9% | -16.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $-0.32 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.05 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.02 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.16 | $-0.15 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $293.5M | $180.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $392.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $274.2M | $1.7B |
| Total Assets | $949.9M | $4.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.43× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $293.5M | $180.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $263.8M | $165.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $231.0M | $144.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $250.6M | $147.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $249.9M | $159.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $249.8M | $127.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.1M | $122.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $239.6M | $131.9M |
| Q4 25 | $392.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $392.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $391.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $390.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $390.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $389.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $388.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $388.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $274.2M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $230.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $204.3M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $193.6M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $178.8M | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $132.5M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.7M | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | $949.9M | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $868.8M | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $815.3M | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $789.8M | $5.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $785.0M | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $786.6M | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $749.5M | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $721.8M | $8.0B |
| Q4 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.70× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.92× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.02× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.93× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.97× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $16.3M | $222.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 9.62× | 4.62× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $29.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $16.3M | $222.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.7M | $56.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.5M | $52.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $59.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.9M | $299.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.0M | $62.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.7M | $70.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-29.7M | $92.2M |
| Q4 25 | $16.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-31.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.62× | 4.62× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.27× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FOLD
| Other | $105.8M | 57% |
| Galafold | $64.8M | 35% |
| Pombiliti Opfolda | $14.6M | 8% |
GNL
| Industrial And Distribution Segment | $56.0M | 48% |
| Office Segment | $30.8M | 26% |
| Single Tenant Retail Segment | $30.2M | 26% |
