vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. (FOLD) and INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC (IIIN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($185.2M vs $159.9M, roughly 1.2× INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC). INSTEEL INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 4.7% vs 0.9%, a 3.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.7% vs 23.3%). AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($16.0M vs $-2.2M). Over the past eight quarters, AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (29.5% CAGR vs 12.0%).
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. is a public American biopharmaceutical company based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The company went public in 2007 under the Nasdaq trading symbol FOLD. This followed a 2006 planned offering and subsequent withdrawal, which would have established the trading symbol as AMTX Prior to their IPO, Amicus was funded by a variety of venture capital firms including Radius Ventures, Canaan Partners and New Enterprise Associates.
Insteel Industries Inc is a leading U.S. manufacturer of steel reinforcing products including welded wire reinforcement and steel fibers. It primarily serves non-residential construction, infrastructure, and precast concrete segments across North America, delivering high-performance reinforcement solutions for various construction projects.
FOLD vs IIIN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $185.2M | $159.9M |
| Net Profit | $1.7M | $7.6M |
| Gross Margin | 85.7% | 11.3% |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | 6.0% |
| Net Margin | 0.9% | 4.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.7% | 23.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.5% | 602.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $185.2M | $159.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.1M | $177.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $154.7M | $179.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $125.2M | $160.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $149.7M | $129.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.5M | $134.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.7M | $145.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.4M | $127.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.3M | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.4M | $15.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.7M | $10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.7M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.7M | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.7M | $6.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-48.4M | $6.9M |
| Q4 25 | 85.7% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 88.5% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 90.2% | 17.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.7% | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.1% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.6% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 91.1% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 87.7% | 12.3% |
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.3% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.1% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.3% | 8.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.3% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.8% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -25.1% | 7.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.8% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.3% | 6.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.8% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.8% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.4% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -43.9% | 5.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | $0.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $0.74 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | $0.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $0.52 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.05 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.02 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | $0.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.16 | $0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $293.5M | $15.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $392.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $274.2M | $358.8M |
| Total Assets | $949.9M | $456.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.43× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $293.5M | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $263.8M | $38.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $231.0M | $53.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $250.6M | $28.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $249.9M | $36.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $249.8M | $111.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.1M | $97.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $239.6M | $83.9M |
| Q4 25 | $392.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $392.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $391.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $390.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $390.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $389.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $388.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $388.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $274.2M | $358.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $230.4M | $371.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $204.3M | $356.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $193.6M | $341.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.0M | $331.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $178.8M | $350.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $132.5M | $346.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.7M | $340.6M |
| Q4 25 | $949.9M | $456.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $868.8M | $462.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $815.3M | $471.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $789.8M | $421.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $785.0M | $404.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $786.6M | $422.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $749.5M | $414.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $721.8M | $397.2M |
| Q4 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.70× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.92× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.02× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.93× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.97× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $16.3M | $-701.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.0M | $-2.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.6% | -1.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 9.62× | -0.09× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $29.8M | $439.0K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $16.3M | $-701.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.7M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.5M | $28.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.9M | $19.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.0M | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.7M | $18.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-29.7M | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | $16.0M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.3M | $-18.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.9M | $26.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.2M | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.3M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-31.5M | $-580.0K |
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | -1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.9% | -10.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.7% | 15.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | -3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.5% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.0% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.5% | -0.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | 9.62× | -0.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.06× | -1.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.27× | 17.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.20× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FOLD
| Other | $105.8M | 57% |
| Galafold | $64.8M | 35% |
| Pombiliti Opfolda | $14.6M | 8% |
IIIN
| Welded Wire Reinforcement | $108.4M | 68% |
| PC Strand | $51.6M | 32% |
