vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. (FOLD) and LIQUIDITY SERVICES INC (LQDT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($185.2M vs $120.7M, roughly 1.5× LIQUIDITY SERVICES INC). LIQUIDITY SERVICES INC runs the higher net margin — 6.2% vs 0.9%, a 5.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.7% vs 3.7%). Over the past eight quarters, AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (29.5% CAGR vs 13.6%).
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. is a public American biopharmaceutical company based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The company went public in 2007 under the Nasdaq trading symbol FOLD. This followed a 2006 planned offering and subsequent withdrawal, which would have established the trading symbol as AMTX Prior to their IPO, Amicus was funded by a variety of venture capital firms including Radius Ventures, Canaan Partners and New Enterprise Associates.
Liquidity Services, Inc. is an American e-commerce company providing surplus asset management services through a network of online marketplaces. It serves businesses and government agencies by facilitating the resale of surplus, returned, and end-of-life goods. Founded in 1999 and headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
FOLD vs LQDT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $185.2M | $120.7M |
| Net Profit | $1.7M | $7.5M |
| Gross Margin | 85.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | 8.0% |
| Net Margin | 0.9% | 6.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.7% | 3.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.5% | 6.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $120.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $185.2M | $121.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.1M | $118.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $154.7M | $119.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $125.2M | $116.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $149.7M | $122.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.5M | $106.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.7M | $93.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.3M | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.4M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.7M | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.7M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.7M | $6.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.7M | $6.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 85.7% | 47.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 88.5% | 47.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 90.2% | 45.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.7% | 40.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.1% | 41.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.6% | 45.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 91.1% | 52.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.1% | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.3% | 5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.3% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.8% | 8.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.8% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.3% | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.8% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.4% | 6.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | $0.23 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.05 | $0.18 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.02 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | $0.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $293.5M | $204.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $392.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $274.2M | — |
| Total Assets | $949.9M | $400.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.43× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $204.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $293.5M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $263.8M | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $231.0M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $250.6M | $10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $249.9M | $10.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $249.8M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.1M | $6.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $392.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $392.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $391.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $390.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $390.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $389.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $388.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $274.2M | $215.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $230.4M | $203.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $204.3M | $208.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $193.6M | $196.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.0M | $189.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $178.8M | $182.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $132.5M | $172.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $400.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $949.9M | $369.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $868.8M | $375.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $815.3M | $372.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $789.8M | $358.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $785.0M | $333.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $786.6M | $346.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $749.5M | $325.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.70× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.92× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.02× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.93× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $16.3M | $29.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 9.62× | 3.86× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $29.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $29.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.3M | $-526.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.7M | $38.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.5M | $19.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $21.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.9M | $-12.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.0M | $22.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.7M | $22.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.0M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.3M | $36.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.9M | $17.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5M | $19.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.2M | $-14.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.3M | $19.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $20.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.9% | 30.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.7% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 17.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | -11.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.5% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.0% | 21.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 2.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.86× | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.62× | -0.07× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.06× | 4.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.27× | -2.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.45× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FOLD
| Other | $105.8M | 57% |
| Galafold | $64.8M | 35% |
| Pombiliti Opfolda | $14.6M | 8% |
LQDT
| Purchase revenues | $77.9M | 64% |
| Consignment and other fee revenues | $42.9M | 36% |