vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. (FOLD) and Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. (MEC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($185.2M vs $134.3M, roughly 1.4× Mayville Engineering Company, Inc.). AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 0.9% vs -3.2%, a 4.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.7% vs 10.7%). AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($16.0M vs $10.2M). Over the past eight quarters, AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (29.5% CAGR vs -8.8%).
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. is a public American biopharmaceutical company based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The company went public in 2007 under the Nasdaq trading symbol FOLD. This followed a 2006 planned offering and subsequent withdrawal, which would have established the trading symbol as AMTX Prior to their IPO, Amicus was funded by a variety of venture capital firms including Radius Ventures, Canaan Partners and New Enterprise Associates.
Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered leading manufacturer of metal components, fabricated assemblies, and custom engineered solutions. It serves OEM clients across agriculture, construction, transportation, defense, and power sports markets, offering end-to-end services from prototyping to high-volume production for North America.
FOLD vs MEC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $185.2M | $134.3M |
| Net Profit | $1.7M | $-4.4M |
| Gross Margin | 85.7% | 6.8% |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | -4.1% |
| Net Margin | 0.9% | -3.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.7% | 10.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.5% | -127.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $-0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $185.2M | $134.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.1M | $144.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $154.7M | $132.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $125.2M | $135.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $149.7M | $121.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.5M | $135.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.7M | $163.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.4M | $161.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.3M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.4M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.7M | $20.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.7M | $16.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.7M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.7M | $3.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-48.4M | $3.2M |
| Q4 25 | 85.7% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 88.5% | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 90.2% | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.7% | 11.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.1% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.6% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 91.1% | 13.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 87.7% | 13.0% |
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.3% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.8% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -25.1% | 4.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | -3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.8% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.8% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -43.9% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.05 | $0.76 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.02 | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | $0.18 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.16 | $0.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $293.5M | $1.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $392.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $274.2M | $240.7M |
| Total Assets | $949.9M | $563.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.43× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $293.5M | $1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $263.8M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $231.0M | $206.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $250.6M | $183.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $249.9M | $206.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $249.8M | $178.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.1M | $314.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $239.6M | $314.0K |
| Q4 25 | $392.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $392.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $391.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $390.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $390.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $389.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $388.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $388.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $274.2M | $240.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $230.4M | $244.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $204.3M | $246.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $193.6M | $250.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.0M | $251.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $178.8M | $238.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $132.5M | $238.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.7M | $234.0M |
| Q4 25 | $949.9M | $563.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $868.8M | $585.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $815.3M | $433.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $789.8M | $447.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $785.0M | $445.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $786.6M | $466.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $749.5M | $488.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $721.8M | $499.9M |
| Q4 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.70× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.92× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.02× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.93× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.97× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $16.3M | $13.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.0M | $10.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.6% | 7.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | 2.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 9.62× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $29.8M | $26.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $16.3M | $13.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.7M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.5M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $8.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.9M | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.0M | $17.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.7M | $23.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-29.7M | $10.6M |
| Q4 25 | $16.0M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.3M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.9M | $12.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5M | $5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.2M | $35.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.3M | $15.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $19.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-31.5M | $7.8M |
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.9% | -0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.7% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | 29.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.5% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.0% | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.5% | 4.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | 9.62× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 416.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.27× | 2.38× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FOLD
| Other | $105.8M | 57% |
| Galafold | $64.8M | 35% |
| Pombiliti Opfolda | $14.6M | 8% |
MEC
| Fabrication | $72.2M | 54% |
| Construction And Access | $19.2M | 14% |
| Tubes | $16.2M | 12% |
| Other Market | $11.9M | 9% |
| Agriculture | $7.7M | 6% |
| Military | $6.7M | 5% |
| Outdoor Sports | $1.7M | 1% |
