vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. (FOLD) and MGIC INVESTMENT CORP (MTG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MGIC INVESTMENT CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($297.1M vs $185.2M, roughly 1.6× AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC.). MGIC INVESTMENT CORP runs the higher net margin — 55.6% vs 0.9%, a 54.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.7% vs -3.0%). Over the past eight quarters, AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (29.5% CAGR vs -1.4%).
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. is a public American biopharmaceutical company based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The company went public in 2007 under the Nasdaq trading symbol FOLD. This followed a 2006 planned offering and subsequent withdrawal, which would have established the trading symbol as AMTX Prior to their IPO, Amicus was funded by a variety of venture capital firms including Radius Ventures, Canaan Partners and New Enterprise Associates.
MGIC Investment Corporation NYSE: MTG ("MGIC") is a provider of private mortgage insurance in the United States. The company is headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
FOLD vs MTG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $185.2M | $297.1M |
| Net Profit | $1.7M | $165.3M |
| Gross Margin | 85.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.9% | 55.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.7% | -3.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.5% | -10.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $0.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $297.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $185.2M | $298.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.1M | $304.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $154.7M | $304.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $125.2M | $306.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $149.7M | $301.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.5M | $306.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.7M | $305.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $165.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $169.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.3M | $191.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.4M | $192.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.7M | $185.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.7M | $184.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.7M | $200.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.7M | $204.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 85.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 88.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 90.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 91.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | 71.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.3% | 77.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.1% | 80.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.3% | 76.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 77.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.3% | 82.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.8% | 85.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 55.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 56.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | 62.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.8% | 63.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.3% | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.8% | 61.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.8% | 65.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.4% | 66.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.76 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | $0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $0.75 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.05 | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.02 | $0.77 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | $0.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $293.5M | $235.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $392.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $274.2M | $5.0B |
| Total Assets | $949.9M | $6.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.43× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $235.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $293.5M | $369.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $263.8M | $266.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $231.0M | $294.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $250.6M | $207.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $249.9M | $229.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $249.8M | $288.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.1M | $281.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $392.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $392.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $391.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $390.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $390.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $389.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $388.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $274.2M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $230.4M | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $204.3M | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $193.6M | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.0M | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $178.8M | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $132.5M | $5.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $949.9M | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $868.8M | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $815.3M | $6.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $789.8M | $6.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $785.0M | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $786.6M | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $749.5M | $6.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.70× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.92× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.02× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.93× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $16.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 9.62× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $29.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.3M | $230.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.7M | $215.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.5M | $183.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $223.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.9M | $182.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.0M | $182.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.7M | $169.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.0M | $230.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.3M | $215.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.9M | $183.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5M | $223.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.2M | $181.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.3M | $182.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $169.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | 77.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.9% | 70.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.7% | 60.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 73.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | 60.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.5% | 59.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.0% | 55.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.62× | 1.36× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.06× | 1.13× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.27× | 0.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FOLD
| Other | $105.8M | 57% |
| Galafold | $64.8M | 35% |
| Pombiliti Opfolda | $14.6M | 8% |
MTG
Segment breakdown not available.
