vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. (FOLD) and Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($185.2M vs $93.7M, roughly 2.0× Ranpak Holdings Corp.). On growth, AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.7% vs 2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (29.5% CAGR vs 13.7%).
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. is a public American biopharmaceutical company based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The company went public in 2007 under the Nasdaq trading symbol FOLD. This followed a 2006 planned offering and subsequent withdrawal, which would have established the trading symbol as AMTX Prior to their IPO, Amicus was funded by a variety of venture capital firms including Radius Ventures, Canaan Partners and New Enterprise Associates.
Ranpak Holdings Corp. manufactures machines and paper products used in protective paper-based packing for shipping goods and merchandise for e-commerce and industry, along with automation solutions. The company is based in Concord, Ohio, and has production facilities and offices in Reno, Nevada; Kansas City, Missouri; the Netherlands; Czech Republic; Shanghai and Singapore. The paper packaging material can be used for multiple applications like wrapping, cushioning, void fill and cold chain p...
FOLD vs PACK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $185.2M | $93.7M |
| Net Profit | $1.7M | — |
| Gross Margin | 85.7% | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | 0.9% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 23.7% | 2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $185.2M | $93.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.1M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $154.7M | $77.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $125.2M | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $149.7M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.5M | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.7M | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.4M | $72.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.3M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.4M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.7M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.7M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.7M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-48.4M | $-8.1M |
| Q4 25 | 85.7% | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 88.5% | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 90.2% | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.7% | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.1% | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.6% | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 91.1% | 43.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 87.7% | 44.6% |
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.3% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.1% | -12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.3% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.3% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.8% | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -25.1% | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | -12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.8% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.3% | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.8% | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.4% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -43.9% | -11.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.05 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.02 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.16 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $293.5M | $63.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $392.7M | $401.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $274.2M | $534.9M |
| Total Assets | $949.9M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.43× | 0.75× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $293.5M | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $263.8M | $49.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $231.0M | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $250.6M | $65.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $249.9M | $76.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $249.8M | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.1M | $65.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $239.6M | $55.1M |
| Q4 25 | $392.7M | $401.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $392.0M | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $391.3M | $403.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $390.7M | $405.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $390.1M | $406.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $389.5M | $403.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $388.9M | $396.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $388.4M | $396.7M |
| Q4 25 | $274.2M | $534.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $230.4M | $537.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $204.3M | $539.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $193.6M | $544.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.0M | $548.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $178.8M | $564.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $132.5M | $566.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.7M | $560.0M |
| Q4 25 | $949.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $868.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $815.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $789.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $785.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $786.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $749.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $721.8M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | 1.43× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.70× | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.92× | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.02× | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.01× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | 0.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.93× | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.97× | 0.71× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $16.3M | $19.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 9.62× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $29.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $16.3M | $19.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.7M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.5M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.9M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.0M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.7M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-29.7M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $16.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-31.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.62× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.27× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.56× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FOLD
| Other | $105.8M | 57% |
| Galafold | $64.8M | 35% |
| Pombiliti Opfolda | $14.6M | 8% |
PACK
| Other | $47.9M | 51% |
| Europe And Asia Segment | $45.8M | 49% |
