vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. (FOLD) and Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. (PANL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($185.2M vs $183.9M, roughly 1.0× Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd.). Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 6.5% vs 0.9%, a 5.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.9% vs 23.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (32.5% CAGR vs 29.5%).
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. is a public American biopharmaceutical company based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The company went public in 2007 under the Nasdaq trading symbol FOLD. This followed a 2006 planned offering and subsequent withdrawal, which would have established the trading symbol as AMTX Prior to their IPO, Amicus was funded by a variety of venture capital firms including Radius Ventures, Canaan Partners and New Enterprise Associates.
Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. is a global dry bulk logistics and shipping service provider. It operates a modern fleet of dry bulk vessels to transport a wide range of commodities including grains, minerals, construction materials, and energy-related raw materials, serving industrial, agricultural, and energy sector clients across North America, Europe, and Asia with tailored end-to-end bulk cargo supply chain solutions.
FOLD vs PANL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $185.2M | $183.9M |
| Net Profit | $1.7M | $11.9M |
| Gross Margin | 85.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | 9.5% |
| Net Margin | 0.9% | 6.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.7% | 24.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.5% | 40.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $185.2M | $183.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.1M | $168.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $154.7M | $156.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $125.2M | $122.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $149.7M | $147.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.5M | $153.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.7M | $131.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.4M | $104.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.3M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.4M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.7M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.7M | $8.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.7M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.7M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-48.4M | $11.7M |
| Q4 25 | 85.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 88.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 90.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 91.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 87.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.3% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.3% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.3% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.8% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -25.1% | 10.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.8% | -1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.3% | -1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.8% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.4% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -43.9% | 11.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | $0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.05 | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.02 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.16 | $0.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $293.5M | $103.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $392.7M | $249.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $274.2M | $429.3M |
| Total Assets | $949.9M | $928.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.43× | 0.58× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $293.5M | $103.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $263.8M | $94.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $231.0M | $59.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $250.6M | $63.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $249.9M | $86.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $249.8M | $93.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.1M | $77.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $239.6M | $95.9M |
| Q4 25 | $392.7M | $249.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $392.0M | $256.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $391.3M | $244.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $390.7M | $251.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $390.1M | $257.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $389.5M | $133.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $388.9M | $90.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $388.4M | $95.9M |
| Q4 25 | $274.2M | $429.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $230.4M | $420.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $204.3M | $414.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $193.6M | $420.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.0M | $427.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $178.8M | $332.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $132.5M | $331.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.7M | $332.0M |
| Q4 25 | $949.9M | $928.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $868.8M | $932.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $815.3M | $916.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $789.8M | $918.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $785.0M | $936.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $786.6M | $749.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $749.5M | $692.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $721.8M | $703.3M |
| Q4 25 | 1.43× | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.70× | 0.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.92× | 0.59× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.02× | 0.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.01× | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | 0.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.93× | 0.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.97× | 0.29× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $16.3M | $15.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 9.62× | 1.27× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $29.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $16.3M | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.7M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.5M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.9M | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.0M | $28.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.7M | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-29.7M | $9.0M |
| Q4 25 | $16.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-31.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.62× | 1.27× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.06× | 2.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.27× | 2.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.57× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.43× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.77× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FOLD
| Other | $105.8M | 57% |
| Galafold | $64.8M | 35% |
| Pombiliti Opfolda | $14.6M | 8% |
PANL
| Voyage | $166.3M | 90% |
| Charter | $13.1M | 7% |
| Terminal Stevedore Revenue | $4.4M | 2% |
