vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of FORMFACTOR INC (FORM) and FOSTER L B CO (FSTR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

FORMFACTOR INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($226.1M vs $160.4M, roughly 1.4× FOSTER L B CO). FORMFACTOR INC runs the higher net margin — 9.0% vs 1.5%, a 7.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FORMFACTOR INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.0% vs 25.1%). FORMFACTOR INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($30.7M vs $19.8M). Over the past eight quarters, FOSTER L B CO's revenue compounded faster (13.6% CAGR vs 7.0%).

Formfactor, Inc. is a provider of test and measurement technologies for integrated circuits, with its headquarters in Livermore, California. It provides semiconductor companies with products to improve device performance and provide test and measurement technologies for integrated circuits.

Foster L B Co. is a U.S.-headquartered industrial manufacturing firm that develops, produces and distributes engineered access solutions, construction components, and rail infrastructure products. It serves commercial construction, transportation, and industrial end markets across North America and selected international regions.

FORM vs FSTR — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FORM
FORM
1.4× larger
FORM
$226.1M
$160.4M
FSTR
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
FORM
FORM
+6.9% gap
FORM
32.0%
25.1%
FSTR
Higher net margin
FORM
FORM
7.5% more per $
FORM
9.0%
1.5%
FSTR
More free cash flow
FORM
FORM
$10.9M more FCF
FORM
$30.7M
$19.8M
FSTR
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
FSTR
FSTR
Annualised
FSTR
13.6%
7.0%
FORM

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
FORM
FORM
FSTR
FSTR
Revenue
$226.1M
$160.4M
Net Profit
$20.4M
$2.4M
Gross Margin
38.4%
19.7%
Operating Margin
7.4%
4.9%
Net Margin
9.0%
1.5%
Revenue YoY
32.0%
25.1%
Net Profit YoY
218.5%
1098.3%
EPS (diluted)
$0.26
$0.22

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FORM
FORM
FSTR
FSTR
Q1 26
$226.1M
Q4 25
$215.2M
$160.4M
Q3 25
$202.7M
$138.3M
Q2 25
$195.8M
$143.6M
Q1 25
$171.4M
$97.8M
Q4 24
$189.5M
$128.2M
Q3 24
$207.9M
$137.5M
Q2 24
$197.5M
$140.8M
Net Profit
FORM
FORM
FSTR
FSTR
Q1 26
$20.4M
Q4 25
$23.2M
$2.4M
Q3 25
$15.7M
$4.4M
Q2 25
$9.1M
$2.9M
Q1 25
$6.4M
$-2.1M
Q4 24
$9.7M
$-242.0K
Q3 24
$18.7M
$35.9M
Q2 24
$19.4M
$2.8M
Gross Margin
FORM
FORM
FSTR
FSTR
Q1 26
38.4%
Q4 25
42.2%
19.7%
Q3 25
39.8%
22.5%
Q2 25
37.3%
21.5%
Q1 25
37.7%
20.6%
Q4 24
38.8%
22.3%
Q3 24
40.7%
23.8%
Q2 24
44.0%
21.7%
Operating Margin
FORM
FORM
FSTR
FSTR
Q1 26
7.4%
Q4 25
10.9%
4.9%
Q3 25
8.9%
6.0%
Q2 25
6.3%
5.3%
Q1 25
1.9%
-2.0%
Q4 24
4.1%
2.4%
Q3 24
8.6%
5.3%
Q2 24
9.0%
3.2%
Net Margin
FORM
FORM
FSTR
FSTR
Q1 26
9.0%
Q4 25
10.8%
1.5%
Q3 25
7.7%
3.1%
Q2 25
4.6%
2.0%
Q1 25
3.7%
-2.2%
Q4 24
5.1%
-0.2%
Q3 24
9.0%
26.1%
Q2 24
9.8%
2.0%
EPS (diluted)
FORM
FORM
FSTR
FSTR
Q1 26
$0.26
Q4 25
$0.29
$0.22
Q3 25
$0.20
$0.40
Q2 25
$0.12
$0.27
Q1 25
$0.08
$-0.20
Q4 24
$0.12
$-0.04
Q3 24
$0.24
$3.27
Q2 24
$0.25
$0.26

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FORM
FORM
FSTR
FSTR
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$123.5M
$4.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$42.6M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.1B
$175.3M
Total Assets
$1.3B
$330.4M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.24×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FORM
FORM
FSTR
FSTR
Q1 26
$123.5M
Q4 25
$103.3M
$4.3M
Q3 25
$266.0M
$3.4M
Q2 25
$249.3M
$4.2M
Q1 25
$299.0M
$2.6M
Q4 24
$360.0M
$2.5M
Q3 24
$354.5M
$3.1M
Q2 24
$357.6M
$4.0M
Total Debt
FORM
FORM
FSTR
FSTR
Q1 26
Q4 25
$12.2M
$42.6M
Q3 25
$58.6M
Q2 25
$81.4M
Q1 25
$82.3M
Q4 24
$13.3M
$46.8M
Q3 24
$68.4M
Q2 24
$87.0M
Stockholders' Equity
FORM
FORM
FSTR
FSTR
Q1 26
$1.1B
Q4 25
$1.0B
$175.3M
Q3 25
$1.0B
$174.8M
Q2 25
$990.0M
$174.4M
Q1 25
$965.9M
$170.8M
Q4 24
$947.8M
$178.3M
Q3 24
$955.0M
$181.9M
Q2 24
$947.9M
$147.1M
Total Assets
FORM
FORM
FSTR
FSTR
Q1 26
$1.3B
Q4 25
$1.2B
$330.4M
Q3 25
$1.2B
$333.9M
Q2 25
$1.2B
$349.9M
Q1 25
$1.2B
$342.8M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$334.6M
Q3 24
$1.2B
$344.5M
Q2 24
$1.2B
$333.3M
Debt / Equity
FORM
FORM
FSTR
FSTR
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.01×
0.24×
Q3 25
0.33×
Q2 25
0.47×
Q1 25
0.48×
Q4 24
0.01×
0.26×
Q3 24
0.38×
Q2 24
0.59×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FORM
FORM
FSTR
FSTR
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$45.0M
$22.2M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$30.7M
$19.8M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
13.6%
12.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
6.7%
1.5%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.21×
9.18×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$37.5M
$25.2M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FORM
FORM
FSTR
FSTR
Q1 26
$45.0M
Q4 25
$46.0M
$22.2M
Q3 25
$27.0M
$29.2M
Q2 25
$18.9M
$10.4M
Q1 25
$23.5M
$-26.1M
Q4 24
$35.9M
$24.3M
Q3 24
$26.7M
$24.7M
Q2 24
$21.9M
$-5.0M
Free Cash Flow
FORM
FORM
FSTR
FSTR
Q1 26
$30.7M
Q4 25
$34.7M
$19.8M
Q3 25
$19.5M
$26.4M
Q2 25
$-47.4M
$7.7M
Q1 25
$5.0M
$-28.7M
Q4 24
$28.3M
$22.3M
Q3 24
$17.8M
$21.7M
Q2 24
$13.5M
$-7.0M
FCF Margin
FORM
FORM
FSTR
FSTR
Q1 26
13.6%
Q4 25
16.1%
12.3%
Q3 25
9.6%
19.1%
Q2 25
-24.2%
5.4%
Q1 25
2.9%
-29.4%
Q4 24
14.9%
17.4%
Q3 24
8.6%
15.8%
Q2 24
6.8%
-5.0%
Capex Intensity
FORM
FORM
FSTR
FSTR
Q1 26
6.7%
Q4 25
5.3%
1.5%
Q3 25
3.7%
2.0%
Q2 25
33.8%
1.9%
Q1 25
10.8%
2.6%
Q4 24
4.0%
1.5%
Q3 24
4.3%
2.2%
Q2 24
4.3%
1.5%
Cash Conversion
FORM
FORM
FSTR
FSTR
Q1 26
2.21×
Q4 25
1.98×
9.18×
Q3 25
1.72×
6.70×
Q2 25
2.08×
3.61×
Q1 25
3.68×
Q4 24
3.70×
Q3 24
1.43×
0.69×
Q2 24
1.13×
-1.74×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FORM
FORM

Segment breakdown not available.

FSTR
FSTR

Rail Technologies And Services Segment$98.0M61%
Over Time Output Method$26.3M16%
Services$19.4M12%
Rail Technologies Products$10.0M6%
Over Time Input Method$8.3M5%

Related Comparisons