vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL) and HELIX ENERGY SOLUTIONS GROUP INC (HLX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HELIX ENERGY SOLUTIONS GROUP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($287.9M vs $270.2M, roughly 1.1× Fossil Group, Inc.). HELIX ENERGY SOLUTIONS GROUP INC runs the higher net margin — -4.7% vs -14.8%, a 10.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HELIX ENERGY SOLUTIONS GROUP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-13.8% vs -21.1%). HELIX ENERGY SOLUTIONS GROUP INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($59.0M vs $-22.5M). Over the past eight quarters, HELIX ENERGY SOLUTIONS GROUP INC's revenue compounded faster (-11.2% CAGR vs -11.4%).
Fossil Group, Inc., is an American fashion design and manufacturer founded in 1984 by Tom Kartsotis and based in Richardson, Texas. Their brands include Fossil, Relic, Michele Watch, Skagen Denmark, WSI, and Zodiac Watches. Fossil also makes licensed accessories for brands such as BMW, Puma, Emporio Armani, Michael Kors, DKNY, Diesel, Kate Spade New York, Tory Burch, Chaps, and Armani Exchange.
Helix Energy Solutions Inc., known as Cal Dive International prior to 2006, is an American oil and gas services company headquartered in Houston, Texas. The company is a global provider of offshore services in well intervention and ROV operations of new and existing oil and gas fields.
FOSL vs HLX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $270.2M | $287.9M |
| Net Profit | $-40.0M | $-13.4M |
| Gross Margin | 49.0% | 3.1% |
| Operating Margin | -8.0% | — |
| Net Margin | -14.8% | -4.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -21.1% | -13.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -257.8% | -536.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.76 | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $287.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $270.2M | $334.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $220.4M | $377.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $233.3M | $302.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $278.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $342.3M | $355.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $287.8M | $342.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.0M | $364.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-13.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-40.0M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.1M | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-17.9M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.2M | $20.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-31.9M | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-38.8M | $32.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 49.0% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.5% | 17.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 61.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.4% | 19.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.6% | 20.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -8.0% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.9% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.8% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.5% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.1% | 14.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | -4.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -14.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.0% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.7% | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.3% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.1% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -14.9% | 8.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.76 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.04 | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.33 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.15 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.60 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.73 | $0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $79.2M | $501.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $169.1M | $303.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $112.6M | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $701.0M | $2.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.50× | 0.20× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $501.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $79.2M | $445.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.9M | $338.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.3M | $319.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $370.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $123.6M | $368.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $106.3M | $324.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $104.9M | $275.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $303.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $169.1M | $308.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $165.6M | $307.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $167.2M | $311.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.7M | $315.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $173.4M | $314.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $156.5M | $318.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $112.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $150.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $148.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $189.6M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $701.0M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $704.5M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $686.0M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $763.6M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $812.4M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $785.7M | $2.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.50× | 0.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.10× | 0.20× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.19× | 0.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.09× | 0.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.06× | 0.20× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.83× | 0.21× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-22.2M | $61.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-22.5M | $59.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -8.3% | 20.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-46.0M | $167.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $61.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-22.2M | $113.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.4M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-60.4M | $-17.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.5M | $78.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.8M | $55.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.4M | $-12.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $59.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-22.5M | $107.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6M | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-60.6M | $-21.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.5M | $65.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-24.1M | $52.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.6M | $-16.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -8.3% | 32.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -26.0% | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | 18.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.4% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.1% | -4.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 1.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.38× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FOSL
| Transferred At Point In Time | $109.7M | 41% |
| Traditional Watches | $91.3M | 34% |
| Other | $50.8M | 19% |
| Leathers | $9.5M | 4% |
| Jewelry | $4.0M | 1% |
| Smartwatches | $3.3M | 1% |
| Products Other | $1.6M | 1% |
HLX
Segment breakdown not available.
