vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL) and Merchants Bancorp (MBIN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fossil Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($270.2M vs $175.2M, roughly 1.5× Merchants Bancorp). Merchants Bancorp runs the higher net margin — 38.6% vs -14.8%, a 53.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Merchants Bancorp's revenue compounded faster (4.8% CAGR vs -11.4%).
Fossil Group, Inc., is an American fashion design and manufacturer founded in 1984 by Tom Kartsotis and based in Richardson, Texas. Their brands include Fossil, Relic, Michele Watch, Skagen Denmark, WSI, and Zodiac Watches. Fossil also makes licensed accessories for brands such as BMW, Puma, Emporio Armani, Michael Kors, DKNY, Diesel, Kate Spade New York, Tory Burch, Chaps, and Armani Exchange.
Ameris Bancorp is an American bank holding company headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia. Through its bank subsidiary, Ameris Bank, the company operates full-service branches in Georgia, Alabama, Florida, North Carolina and South Carolina, and mortgage-only locations in Georgia, Alabama, Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, Maryland, and Tennessee. The company offers online and mobile banking options for both consumers and businesses.
FOSL vs MBIN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $270.2M | $175.2M |
| Net Profit | $-40.0M | $67.7M |
| Gross Margin | 49.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -8.0% | — |
| Net Margin | -14.8% | 38.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -21.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -257.8% | 16.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.76 | $1.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $175.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $270.2M | $185.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $220.4M | $171.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $233.3M | $179.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $145.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $342.3M | $193.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $287.8M | $149.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.0M | $159.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $67.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-40.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.1M | $54.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-17.9M | $38.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $58.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-31.9M | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-38.8M | $76.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 49.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 61.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -8.0% | 39.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.9% | 27.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 52.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.8% | 66.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.5% | 54.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.1% | 62.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -14.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.0% | 32.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.7% | 21.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.1% | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -14.9% | 47.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.76 | $1.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.04 | $0.97 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.33 | $0.60 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.93 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.15 | $1.84 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.60 | $1.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.73 | $1.49 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $79.2M | $83.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $169.1M | $32.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $112.6M | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $701.0M | $20.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.50× | 0.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $83.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $79.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $123.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $106.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $104.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $32.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $169.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $165.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $167.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $173.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $156.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $112.6M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $150.3M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.6M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $148.7M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.4M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $189.6M | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $20.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $701.0M | $19.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $704.5M | $19.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $686.0M | $19.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $763.6M | $18.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $812.4M | $18.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $785.7M | $18.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.50× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.10× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.09× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.83× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-22.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-22.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -8.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-46.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-22.2M | $-341.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.4M | $29.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-60.4M | $-121.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $148.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.5M | $-835.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.8M | $-492.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.4M | $51.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-22.5M | $-362.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6M | $24.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-60.6M | $-125.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $141.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.5M | $-853.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-24.1M | $-497.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.6M | $45.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -8.3% | -195.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -26.0% | -70.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 96.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | -440.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.4% | -332.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.1% | 28.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.54× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -8.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.67× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FOSL
| Transferred At Point In Time | $109.7M | 41% |
| Traditional Watches | $91.3M | 34% |
| Other | $50.8M | 19% |
| Leathers | $9.5M | 4% |
| Jewelry | $4.0M | 1% |
| Smartwatches | $3.3M | 1% |
| Products Other | $1.6M | 1% |
MBIN
| Net Interest Income | $128.6M | 73% |
| Noninterest Income | $46.6M | 27% |
