vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL) and Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd (NISN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fossil Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($270.2M vs $192.5M, roughly 1.4× Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd). Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd runs the higher net margin — 5.4% vs -14.8%, a 20.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.0% vs -21.1%). Fossil Group, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-22.5M vs $-69.4M).
Fossil Group, Inc., is an American fashion design and manufacturer founded in 1984 by Tom Kartsotis and based in Richardson, Texas. Their brands include Fossil, Relic, Michele Watch, Skagen Denmark, WSI, and Zodiac Watches. Fossil also makes licensed accessories for brands such as BMW, Puma, Emporio Armani, Michael Kors, DKNY, Diesel, Kate Spade New York, Tory Burch, Chaps, and Armani Exchange.
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. offers integrated supply chain management solutions, fintech services, and industrial digitalization tools. It mainly serves small and medium-sized enterprises across various sectors in the Chinese market, focusing on boosting supply chain efficiency, cutting operational costs, and supporting clients' digital transformation initiatives.
FOSL vs NISN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $270.2M | $192.5M |
| Net Profit | $-40.0M | $10.3M |
| Gross Margin | 49.0% | 9.0% |
| Operating Margin | -8.0% | — |
| Net Margin | -14.8% | 5.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -21.1% | 0.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -257.8% | 0.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.76 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $270.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $220.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $233.3M | $192.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $342.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $287.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.0M | $192.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $254.9M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $344.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-40.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-17.9M | $10.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-31.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-38.8M | $10.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-24.3M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-60.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 49.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 61.3% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.6% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 52.4% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 47.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -8.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.1% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.5% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -13.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -14.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.7% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -14.9% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.5% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -17.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.76 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.33 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.60 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.73 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.46 | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-1.16 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $79.2M | $45.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $169.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $112.6M | $211.1M |
| Total Assets | $701.0M | $271.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.50× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $79.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.3M | $45.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $123.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $106.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $104.9M | $55.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $112.9M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $116.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $169.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $165.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $167.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $173.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $156.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $202.9M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $255.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $112.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $150.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.6M | $211.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $148.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $189.6M | $204.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $229.1M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $281.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $701.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $704.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $686.0M | $271.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $763.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $812.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $785.7M | $268.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $891.0M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $1.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.50× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.10× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.09× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.89× | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 0.91× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-22.2M | $-69.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-22.5M | $-69.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -8.3% | -36.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -6.72× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-46.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-22.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-60.4M | $-69.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.4M | $-69.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $622.0K | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-22.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-22.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-60.6M | $-69.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-24.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.6M | $-69.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-26.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | -8.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -26.0% | -36.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.1% | -36.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -7.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 1.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.72× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -6.73× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FOSL
| Transferred At Point In Time | $109.7M | 41% |
| Traditional Watches | $91.3M | 34% |
| Other | $50.8M | 19% |
| Leathers | $9.5M | 4% |
| Jewelry | $4.0M | 1% |
| Smartwatches | $3.3M | 1% |
| Products Other | $1.6M | 1% |
NISN
| Supply chain trading business | $142.1M | 74% |
| Small and Medium Enterprise financing solutions | $48.5M | 25% |
| Supply Chain financing solutions | $1.9M | 1% |
