vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL) and RPC INC (RES). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

RPC INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($425.8M vs $270.2M, roughly 1.6× Fossil Group, Inc.). RPC INC runs the higher net margin — -0.7% vs -14.8%, a 14.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RPC INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (27.0% vs -21.1%). RPC INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($31.2M vs $-22.5M). Over the past eight quarters, RPC INC's revenue compounded faster (6.2% CAGR vs -11.4%).

Fossil Group, Inc., is an American fashion design and manufacturer founded in 1984 by Tom Kartsotis and based in Richardson, Texas. Their brands include Fossil, Relic, Michele Watch, Skagen Denmark, WSI, and Zodiac Watches. Fossil also makes licensed accessories for brands such as BMW, Puma, Emporio Armani, Michael Kors, DKNY, Diesel, Kate Spade New York, Tory Burch, Chaps, and Armani Exchange.

RPC Group plc is based in the United Kingdom, and is one of Europe's largest supplier of plastic packaging. Its headquarters are in Rushden in Northamptonshire. It was listed on the London Stock Exchange until it was acquired in 2019 by Berry Global Group Inc, which in turn was acquired by Amcor in 2025.

FOSL vs RES — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
RES
RES
1.6× larger
RES
$425.8M
$270.2M
FOSL
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
RES
RES
+48.0% gap
RES
27.0%
-21.1%
FOSL
Higher net margin
RES
RES
14.1% more per $
RES
-0.7%
-14.8%
FOSL
More free cash flow
RES
RES
$53.7M more FCF
RES
$31.2M
$-22.5M
FOSL
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
RES
RES
Annualised
RES
6.2%
-11.4%
FOSL

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
FOSL
FOSL
RES
RES
Revenue
$270.2M
$425.8M
Net Profit
$-40.0M
$-3.1M
Gross Margin
49.0%
21.0%
Operating Margin
-8.0%
-0.9%
Net Margin
-14.8%
-0.7%
Revenue YoY
-21.1%
27.0%
Net Profit YoY
-257.8%
-124.0%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.76
$-0.02

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FOSL
FOSL
RES
RES
Q4 25
$270.2M
$425.8M
Q3 25
$220.4M
$447.1M
Q2 25
$233.3M
$420.8M
Q1 25
$332.9M
Q4 24
$342.3M
$335.4M
Q3 24
$287.8M
$337.7M
Q2 24
$260.0M
$364.2M
Q1 24
$254.9M
$377.8M
Net Profit
FOSL
FOSL
RES
RES
Q4 25
$-40.0M
$-3.1M
Q3 25
$-2.1M
$13.0M
Q2 25
$-17.9M
$10.1M
Q1 25
$12.0M
Q4 24
$-11.2M
$12.8M
Q3 24
$-31.9M
$18.8M
Q2 24
$-38.8M
$32.4M
Q1 24
$-24.3M
$27.5M
Gross Margin
FOSL
FOSL
RES
RES
Q4 25
49.0%
21.0%
Q3 25
57.5%
25.1%
Q2 25
61.3%
24.5%
Q1 25
26.7%
Q4 24
53.9%
25.4%
Q3 24
49.4%
26.7%
Q2 24
52.6%
28.0%
Q1 24
52.4%
26.8%
Operating Margin
FOSL
FOSL
RES
RES
Q4 25
-8.0%
-0.9%
Q3 25
3.9%
4.7%
Q2 25
-2.9%
3.7%
Q1 25
3.7%
Q4 24
-4.8%
3.1%
Q3 24
-8.5%
5.7%
Q2 24
-13.1%
9.7%
Q1 24
-11.5%
8.6%
Net Margin
FOSL
FOSL
RES
RES
Q4 25
-14.8%
-0.7%
Q3 25
-1.0%
2.9%
Q2 25
-7.7%
2.4%
Q1 25
3.6%
Q4 24
-3.3%
3.8%
Q3 24
-11.1%
5.6%
Q2 24
-14.9%
8.9%
Q1 24
-9.5%
7.3%
EPS (diluted)
FOSL
FOSL
RES
RES
Q4 25
$-0.76
$-0.02
Q3 25
$-0.04
$0.06
Q2 25
$-0.33
$0.05
Q1 25
$0.06
Q4 24
$-0.15
$0.06
Q3 24
$-0.60
$0.09
Q2 24
$-0.73
$0.15
Q1 24
$-0.46
$0.13

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FOSL
FOSL
RES
RES
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$79.2M
$210.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$169.1M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$112.6M
$1.1B
Total Assets
$701.0M
$1.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.50×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FOSL
FOSL
RES
RES
Q4 25
$79.2M
$210.0M
Q3 25
$109.9M
$163.5M
Q2 25
$78.3M
$162.1M
Q1 25
$326.7M
Q4 24
$123.6M
$326.0M
Q3 24
$106.3M
$276.9M
Q2 24
$104.9M
$261.5M
Q1 24
$112.9M
$212.2M
Total Debt
FOSL
FOSL
RES
RES
Q4 25
$169.1M
Q3 25
$165.6M
Q2 25
$167.2M
Q1 25
Q4 24
$162.7M
Q3 24
$173.4M
Q2 24
$156.5M
Q1 24
$202.9M
Stockholders' Equity
FOSL
FOSL
RES
RES
Q4 25
$112.6M
$1.1B
Q3 25
$150.3M
$1.1B
Q2 25
$140.6M
$1.1B
Q1 25
$1.1B
Q4 24
$148.7M
$1.1B
Q3 24
$164.4M
$1.1B
Q2 24
$189.6M
$1.1B
Q1 24
$229.1M
$1.0B
Total Assets
FOSL
FOSL
RES
RES
Q4 25
$701.0M
$1.5B
Q3 25
$704.5M
$1.5B
Q2 25
$686.0M
$1.5B
Q1 25
$1.3B
Q4 24
$763.6M
$1.4B
Q3 24
$812.4M
$1.3B
Q2 24
$785.7M
$1.3B
Q1 24
$891.0M
$1.3B
Debt / Equity
FOSL
FOSL
RES
RES
Q4 25
1.50×
Q3 25
1.10×
Q2 25
1.19×
Q1 25
Q4 24
1.09×
Q3 24
1.06×
Q2 24
0.83×
Q1 24
0.89×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FOSL
FOSL
RES
RES
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-22.2M
$61.9M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-22.5M
$31.2M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-8.3%
7.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.1%
7.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-46.0M
$52.9M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FOSL
FOSL
RES
RES
Q4 25
$-22.2M
$61.9M
Q3 25
$9.4M
$46.5M
Q2 25
$-60.4M
$53.1M
Q1 25
$39.9M
Q4 24
$30.5M
$94.2M
Q3 24
$-22.8M
$70.7M
Q2 24
$38.4M
$127.9M
Q1 24
$622.0K
$56.6M
Free Cash Flow
FOSL
FOSL
RES
RES
Q4 25
$-22.5M
$31.2M
Q3 25
$8.6M
$4.1M
Q2 25
$-60.6M
$10.0M
Q1 25
$7.6M
Q4 24
$28.5M
$53.7M
Q3 24
$-24.1M
$19.1M
Q2 24
$36.6M
$52.9M
Q1 24
$-1.1M
$3.8M
FCF Margin
FOSL
FOSL
RES
RES
Q4 25
-8.3%
7.3%
Q3 25
3.9%
0.9%
Q2 25
-26.0%
2.4%
Q1 25
2.3%
Q4 24
8.3%
16.0%
Q3 24
-8.4%
5.6%
Q2 24
14.1%
14.5%
Q1 24
-0.4%
1.0%
Capex Intensity
FOSL
FOSL
RES
RES
Q4 25
0.1%
7.2%
Q3 25
0.4%
9.5%
Q2 25
0.1%
10.2%
Q1 25
9.7%
Q4 24
0.6%
12.1%
Q3 24
0.4%
15.3%
Q2 24
0.7%
20.6%
Q1 24
0.7%
14.0%
Cash Conversion
FOSL
FOSL
RES
RES
Q4 25
Q3 25
3.59×
Q2 25
5.23×
Q1 25
3.31×
Q4 24
7.38×
Q3 24
3.76×
Q2 24
3.95×
Q1 24
2.06×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FOSL
FOSL

Transferred At Point In Time$109.7M41%
Traditional Watches$91.3M34%
Other$50.8M19%
Leathers$9.5M4%
Jewelry$4.0M1%
Smartwatches$3.3M1%
Products Other$1.6M1%

RES
RES

Technical Service$405.2M95%
Other$8.8M2%
Nitrogen$6.6M2%

Related Comparisons