vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL) and RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RLJ Lodging Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($328.6M vs $270.2M, roughly 1.2× Fossil Group, Inc.). RLJ Lodging Trust runs the higher net margin — 0.1% vs -14.8%, a 14.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RLJ Lodging Trust posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.4% vs -21.1%). RLJ Lodging Trust produced more free cash flow last quarter ($117.4M vs $-22.5M). Over the past eight quarters, RLJ Lodging Trust's revenue compounded faster (0.6% CAGR vs -11.4%).
Fossil Group, Inc., is an American fashion design and manufacturer founded in 1984 by Tom Kartsotis and based in Richardson, Texas. Their brands include Fossil, Relic, Michele Watch, Skagen Denmark, WSI, and Zodiac Watches. Fossil also makes licensed accessories for brands such as BMW, Puma, Emporio Armani, Michael Kors, DKNY, Diesel, Kate Spade New York, Tory Burch, Chaps, and Armani Exchange.
The RLJ Companies is an American asset management firm owned by entrepreneur Robert Louis Johnson. After selling Black Entertainment Television in 2001, Johnson's first company, he created RLJ Companies in Bethesda, Maryland. The company's network includes hotel real estate investment, private equity, financial services, asset management, insurance services, car dealerships, sports and entertainment, and video lottery terminal (VLT) gaming. The company is headquartered in Bethesda and has add...
FOSL vs RLJ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $270.2M | $328.6M |
| Net Profit | $-40.0M | $430.0K |
| Gross Margin | 49.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -8.0% | 0.2% |
| Net Margin | -14.8% | 0.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -21.1% | -0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -257.8% | -92.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.76 | $-0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $270.2M | $328.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $220.4M | $330.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $233.3M | $363.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $328.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $342.3M | $330.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $287.8M | $345.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.0M | $369.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $254.9M | $324.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-40.0M | $430.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.1M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-17.9M | $28.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.2M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-31.9M | $20.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-38.8M | $37.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-24.3M | $4.9M |
| Q4 25 | 49.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 61.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 52.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -8.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | -1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.9% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.5% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.1% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.5% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | -14.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.0% | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.1% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -14.9% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.5% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.76 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.33 | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.15 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.60 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.73 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.46 | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $79.2M | $410.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $169.1M | $2.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $112.6M | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $701.0M | $4.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.50× | 1.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $79.2M | $410.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.9M | $374.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.3M | $373.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $347.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $123.6M | $409.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $106.3M | $385.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $104.9M | $371.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $112.9M | $350.2M |
| Q4 25 | $169.1M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $165.6M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $167.2M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.7M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $173.4M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $156.5M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $202.9M | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $112.6M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $150.3M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.6M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $148.7M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.4M | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $189.6M | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $229.1M | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | $701.0M | $4.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $704.5M | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $686.0M | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $763.6M | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $812.4M | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $785.7M | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $891.0M | $4.9B |
| Q4 25 | 1.50× | 1.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.10× | 1.01× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.19× | 1.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.09× | 0.97× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.06× | 0.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.83× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.89× | 0.96× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-22.2M | $243.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-22.5M | $117.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -8.3% | 35.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 38.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 566.97× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-46.0M | $186.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-22.2M | $243.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.4M | $63.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-60.4M | $101.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.5M | $285.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.8M | $80.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.4M | $113.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $622.0K | $20.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-22.5M | $117.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6M | $33.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-60.6M | $66.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-30.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.5M | $148.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-24.1M | $45.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.6M | $74.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | $-13.0M |
| Q4 25 | -8.3% | 35.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -26.0% | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.4% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.1% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.4% | -4.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 41.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 10.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 566.97× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.56× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.85× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 53.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.21× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FOSL
| Transferred At Point In Time | $109.7M | 41% |
| Traditional Watches | $91.3M | 34% |
| Other | $50.8M | 19% |
| Leathers | $9.5M | 4% |
| Jewelry | $4.0M | 1% |
| Smartwatches | $3.3M | 1% |
| Products Other | $1.6M | 1% |
RLJ
| Occupancy | $262.1M | 80% |
| Food And Beverage | $41.9M | 13% |
| Hotel Other | $24.6M | 7% |
